2018 Expo VS 2021 Tahoe test drive.

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

larryjb

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2016
Posts
48
Reaction score
18
Location
Canada
To be honest, I don't like any of the modern offerings. I'd much rather have the column or floor shifter over the push buttons on the GM or the dial shifter on the Fords. The column or floor shifter is easy and intuitive for anyone to find and use. If you are parallel parking or backing into a parking spot, I don't want to have to fuss with "new and cool".

My wife does like the power folding seats on her '08 Explorer while I like the mechanical seats on my '02 Tahoe. I can remove the 3rd row seats entirely leaving a solid floor with the exception of the 2nd row seat. I currently have a cargo liner that can remain in the truck regardless of whether I have the 3rd row installed or not. It would not be practical to have a cargo liner if you have power folding seats. I don't see how you can have an effective full cargo liner with power folding 3rd row seats. (I admit that my cargo liner won't cover the 2nd row seat area, but the coverage up to the 2nd row is usually enough.)

The buttons and knobs on the older Chevy's and Fords are quick and easy to learn and use. They do anything I need and want. These new touch screens in the center console take up too much real estate space in the dash board. All I need for the back up camera is a screen built into the rear view camera:

https://www.mastertailgaters.com/collections/rear-view-mirrors-with-lcd

I really do not like having radio and HVAC controls embedded into the touch screen as is the trend. One plus for the Expedition is that the HVAC controls, as far as I know, are still physical buttons.

Personally, I'm still on the fence between GM's DFM (dynamic fuel management) vs Ford's Ecoboost. The Ecoboost would be far more complex to fix IF something goes wrong. It does seem that Ford has solved the carbon issue though, and GM's DFM has become equally less problematic. GM's 6.2 or 5.3, remaining a pushrod engine, would be easier to work on. I like keeping cars/trucks going for a long time. Sooner or later, some engine work will have to be done on either vehicle. Would I rather fix an Ecoboost or DFM? Don't know yet. I'll admit, I do like the performance of the new drive trains over my old 5.3. My favourite so far is my 08 Explorer with the 4.6L + 6 speed transmission.

As for towing capabilities between the Expedition vs Suburban, a number you really need to pay attention to is the GCWR because you have to consider all the people and stuff you are packing along with the trailer. The towing ratings can be misleading. The GCWR of a 2020 Suburban can be up to 14,000. The GCWR of an Expedition can be up to 15,500 lbs which is slightly higher. After you subtract the weight of each vehicle you get 8000 lbs for the Suburban which includes the trailer PLUS you and your gear. You get 9000 lbs for the equivalent expedition. The 1000 lb difference is not a whole lot. GM used to offer a heavy duty Suburban 2500 that had a GCWR of 16000 lbs. Now THAT made a difference. The trailer rating wasn't much more, but you could add a lot more to the back of your truck as well and still be below the GCWR. Alas, it is not offered anymore.

Right now though, I'm fed up with all the extra distracting electronic "cool" stuff going into cars and trucks. They are becoming more "cool", but in my opinion, less useful and practical in many ways.
 

shane_th_ee

Full Access Members
Joined
Aug 31, 2017
Posts
868
Reaction score
661
Location
Seattle
All I need for the back up camera is a screen built into the rear view camera:

https://www.mastertailgaters.com/collections/rear-view-mirrors-with-lcd

I really do not like having radio and HVAC controls embedded into the touch screen as is the trend. One plus for the Expedition is that the HVAC controls, as far as I know, are still physical buttons.

As for towing capabilities...
I'm going to suggest you'll change your mind the first time you hitch up a trailer using a big screen and the camera zoom function.6F5FACBC-E5F0-4A08-9CC1-7DBD46D2CAB4.jpeg
 

larryjb

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2016
Posts
48
Reaction score
18
Location
Canada
Yes, that is a nice feature, but not a critical feature for me. I can see well enough with my backup camera and rear view mirror monitor.

The dash of the Expedition and Excursion is actually quite good. The Explorer is terrible though. But that dial shifter.... That could drive me nuts. Give me the column shifter. I'll admit it, I'm an ol' stick in the mud!
 

LokiWolf

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2016
Posts
3,653
Reaction score
2,459
Location
Richmond VA
To be honest, I don't like any of the modern offerings. I'd much rather have the column or floor shifter over the push buttons on the GM or the dial shifter on the Fords. The column or floor shifter is easy and intuitive for anyone to find and use. If you are parallel parking or backing into a parking spot, I don't want to have to fuss with "new and cool".

My wife does like the power folding seats on her '08 Explorer while I like the mechanical seats on my '02 Tahoe. I can remove the 3rd row seats entirely leaving a solid floor with the exception of the 2nd row seat. I currently have a cargo liner that can remain in the truck regardless of whether I have the 3rd row installed or not. It would not be practical to have a cargo liner if you have power folding seats. I don't see how you can have an effective full cargo liner with power folding 3rd row seats. (I admit that my cargo liner won't cover the 2nd row seat area, but the coverage up to the 2nd row is usually enough.)

The buttons and knobs on the older Chevy's and Fords are quick and easy to learn and use. They do anything I need and want. These new touch screens in the center console take up too much real estate space in the dash board. All I need for the back up camera is a screen built into the rear view camera:

https://www.mastertailgaters.com/collections/rear-view-mirrors-with-lcd

I really do not like having radio and HVAC controls embedded into the touch screen as is the trend. One plus for the Expedition is that the HVAC controls, as far as I know, are still physical buttons.

Personally, I'm still on the fence between GM's DFM (dynamic fuel management) vs Ford's Ecoboost. The Ecoboost would be far more complex to fix IF something goes wrong. It does seem that Ford has solved the carbon issue though, and GM's DFM has become equally less problematic. GM's 6.2 or 5.3, remaining a pushrod engine, would be easier to work on. I like keeping cars/trucks going for a long time. Sooner or later, some engine work will have to be done on either vehicle. Would I rather fix an Ecoboost or DFM? Don't know yet. I'll admit, I do like the performance of the new drive trains over my old 5.3. My favourite so far is my 08 Explorer with the 4.6L + 6 speed transmission.

As for towing capabilities between the Expedition vs Suburban, a number you really need to pay attention to is the GCWR because you have to consider all the people and stuff you are packing along with the trailer. The towing ratings can be misleading. The GCWR of a 2020 Suburban can be up to 14,000. The GCWR of an Expedition can be up to 15,500 lbs which is slightly higher. After you subtract the weight of each vehicle you get 8000 lbs for the Suburban which includes the trailer PLUS you and your gear. You get 9000 lbs for the equivalent expedition. The 1000 lb difference is not a whole lot. GM used to offer a heavy duty Suburban 2500 that had a GCWR of 16000 lbs. Now THAT made a difference. The trailer rating wasn't much more, but you could add a lot more to the back of your truck as well and still be below the GCWR. Alas, it is not offered anymore.

Right now though, I'm fed up with all the extra distracting electronic "cool" stuff going into cars and trucks. They are becoming more "cool", but in my opinion, less useful and practical in many ways.

HaHa...

This made me seriously laugh.

This was the SUV equivalent of “get off my lawn”.

There are several cargo liners that can fold with the seats...

You are the exception. The majority of up and coming buyers want the “Tech”. We want phone integration, apps, modes and other things like that.

The dial is no less intuitive than a lever or handle. I do personally think the buttons are annoying, but again based on feeling. It is all based on what we learned on.

When manuals went from shift on the column to the floor, people complained, but in the long run it was better.

Now that I am used to the rotating dial, I actually find it easier. A simple turn, and done. It requires less motion. It takes up less space.

If I showed my daughter a shift on the column, she would have no idea, because she has never seen one used. Buttons and dials will be the new normal. It is intuitive for somebody who has never driven.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 

scotthere

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2020
Posts
56
Reaction score
33
Location
Orlando
HaHa...

This made me seriously laugh.

This was the SUV equivalent of “get off my lawn”.

There are several cargo liners that can fold with the seats...

You are the exception. The majority of up and coming buyers want the “Tech”. We want phone integration, apps, modes and other things like that.

The dial is no less intuitive than a lever or handle. I do personally think the buttons are annoying, but again based on feeling. It is all based on what we learned on.

When manuals went from shift on the column to the floor, people complained, but in the long run it was better.

Now that I am used to the rotating dial, I actually find it easier. A simple turn, and done. It requires less motion. It takes up less space.

If I showed my daughter a shift on the column, she would have no idea, because she has never seen one used. Buttons and dials will be the new normal. It is intuitive for somebody who has never driven.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
The stupid transmission is electronic! Just put PNDM buttons on the steering wheel with shift paddles and extend the console cavity to the dash and or offer a front middle seat with fold down arm rests (Navagator seat).

Sent from my SM-N975U1 using Tapatalk
 

LokiWolf

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2016
Posts
3,653
Reaction score
2,459
Location
Richmond VA
The stupid transmission is electronic! Just put PNDM buttons on the steering wheel with shift paddles and extend the console cavity to the dash and or offer a front middle seat with fold down arm rests (Navagator seat).

Sent from my SM-N975U1 using Tapatalk

Yep!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 

JExpedition07

That One Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Posts
6,510
Reaction score
3,123
Location
New York
You can get an 2020 XLT base if you don’t like all the extras, no apps and less to break if you keep long term. You’ll get your small camera. Growing up in the tech generation there is times I dislike it for sure. My uncle spent tens of thousands having a new special intercom system put in an apartment complex he built and now wished he just did old fashion doorbells. Company went under and as the units go bad there is no support or fix.....I’m more interested in the bones (engine, chassis, drivetrain) of my autos so I hear you there. But heated steering wheels, seats, an app to start the car are nice to have and add comfort for those who want it. Don’t knock it till you tried it fits here I guess.
 
Last edited:

drw1926

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2019
Posts
20
Reaction score
17
Location
DFW
Please explain how headroom measurements would be fudged?

Do you dynotest your vehicles to be sure you got the HP the manufacturer says you did?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I never said they were "fudged", I said what's quoted in a brochure may not be what's true in practice, same as it is with fuel efficiency. Different manufacturers use different methods of calculating headroom.

Hypothetical example; let's say both the Expedition and Toyota Sequoia say they have 42.0" of headroom. Do you honestly believe they have identical amounts of headroom when you get in the vehicle and adjust it the way you like it? Of course that's a possibility, but would you purchase a vehicle as expensive as these based on what's in the posted specs? Does that measurement take into account the sunroof or not? The height of the seat? You could have 2-3" of space between the top of your head and the headliner in one, while you may be brushing against the headliner in the other. As I implied in my original post, how else are you going to determine how a vehicle fits you without sitting in the driver's seat and checking it out yourself?
 

carymccarr

Full Access Members
Joined
Aug 11, 2019
Posts
1,749
Reaction score
390
Location
Earth
Hypothetical example; let's say both the Expedition and Toyota Sequoia say they have 42.0" of headroom. Do you honestly believe they have identical amounts of headroom when you get in the vehicle and adjust it the way you like it?

No. Of course not. That makes no sense.

That’s like saying “do you honestly believe truck beds are identical sizes even if you put a tool carrier/locker in just one of them?”

Headroom is measured from a cars interior roof to the seat cushion. As for adjustments? That’s why some manufactures put “min/max” headroom/legroom etc.

I’m not suggesting, by the way, that you shouldn’t test drive cars etc. I was simply stating the fact that both vehicles have identical base headroom figures.
 
Last edited:
Top