Looking for advice on low compression

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

peterwells

Active Member
Joined
May 13, 2005
Posts
35
Reaction score
22
Car in question is a 2008 5.4 3V Expedition, it had a misfire, garage said it had zero compression on cylinder 5, I figured it wasn't worth replacing the engine so decided to bring it home and take a look myself. Performed compression test (cyl/press) 1/180, 2/200, 3/120, 4/150, 5/210, 6/210, 7,185, 8/200. This vehicle has been roundly abused, including overheating at around 175k miles (today it has 200k). Next was a leak test on cylinders 3 and 4, both showed zero leak; I'm scratching my head at this. I was thinking with low compression on adjacent cylinders maybe it was a head gasket issue but the leak test ruled that out. I reperformed the compression test on cylinders 3 and 4 and saw no change on cylinder 3 but cylinder 4 improved to 175 psi.

Two things to add, firstly this is a spare vehicle that we keep around because its size makes it useful for hauling stuff, it's probably going to do less than 3k miles/year; having siad that it has new struct, tyres are good, new TPMS, new chassis mounts, etc. Secondly, I'm thinking a weak valve spring might explain the low compression with zero leak - it's quick for me to pull the valve cover and check.

What would you do? I can pull the head if need be but given the plan for the vehicle can I hobble by with it as is?

All advice appreciated,

Peter
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
P

peterwells

Active Member
Joined
May 13, 2005
Posts
35
Reaction score
22
I've a basic OBII scanner and will try to read the codes, the misfire happened when the car was out of town, my wife stopped at a nearby Ford garage.
 

sjwelds

Full Access Members
Joined
Feb 19, 2016
Posts
836
Reaction score
378
Location
Kansas
Good on you for checking it out yourself. Dealerships aren't exactly known for honesty and integrity.

Could be as simple as a coil or spark plug. A common one is coolant leaking from the heater hose connector and causing a misfire.

The lower compression on a couple cylinders is concerning though. Keep us posted.
 
OP
OP
P

peterwells

Active Member
Joined
May 13, 2005
Posts
35
Reaction score
22
Re CEL codes, I didn't say but since getting the car home I've removed the parts to get the valve covers off, so lots of wiring is disconnect. When I connect the scanner, it's really basic, it tells me a bunch of things about throttle pedal position circuit low, throttle actuator control motor range, etc - nothing about compression. The battery has been disconnected for a few days so I'm thinking the codes relating to the original CEL are lost, the throttle related messages probably come from when I was doing the compression tests.

I'll be out of town for a few days but will be back to this thread when I figure out what to do next.

Top of my list are...
(i) inspect the valve springs on cylinders 3 and 4 - I've convinced myself that would explain a low compression with good leak test
(ii) remove the throttle body and inspect the back of the intake valves, I've a cheap borescope

BTW I did the leak test at high pressure (close to 100 psi), is there a case for doing it at low pressure (say 30 psi) where it might not force a weak valve shut?

This is all pretty new to me, so all advice appreciated.

Peter
 

Yupster Dog

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Dec 7, 2018
Posts
1,321
Reaction score
859
Location
Virginia
inspect the valve springs on cylinders 3 and 4
Whenever it is the 3rd and 4th cylinders the first thing i look at is the heater hoses and the plastic T connectors leaking down on to 3 and 4. Pull coil pack and look for signs of antifreeze down the wells.
 
OP
OP
P

peterwells

Active Member
Joined
May 13, 2005
Posts
35
Reaction score
22
Re the hoses. There is more to this story than I let on. The dealer claimed to have replaced plugs, coil packs and hoses when troubleshooting the car only to say there was a compression issue, I really doubt they did replace those parts but that's a different story. I'm familiar with the hose issue (having changed them twice in the past - that quick connect at the firewall can be a real pain).

My dilemma is with the compression, I guess I'm prepared to pull the head but this vehicle is in its twilight years and I don't want to disturb a bunch of stuff on an old car if I don't need to.

Thank you for replying,

Peter
 

mjp2

Full Access Members
Joined
Apr 19, 2017
Posts
440
Reaction score
279
Location
Howell, NJ
Cylinder 3 is prone to roller follower failure. Not sure if you heard any ticking from that side of the engine ahead of the most recent issues but it's something to check while you have the valve cover off.
 

purevw

Full Access Members
Joined
Dec 26, 2016
Posts
124
Reaction score
76
Location
Texas
Cylinder 3 is prone to roller follower failure. Not sure if you heard any ticking from that side of the engine ahead of the most recent issues but it's something to check while you have the valve cover off.
I agree it's something to look at. On number 7 failures, it seems an intake rocker often gets tossed. If number 3 is the same, then you might have a single intake opening on the number 3 cylinder and two intakes opening on the others. Could possibly explain compression differences. As far as your earlier question, the valve springs should be holding the valves very securely into the seats. I don't see 100psi adding much to that, so lowering to 30 pounds probably wouldn't produce a change.
 
OP
OP
P

peterwells

Active Member
Joined
May 13, 2005
Posts
35
Reaction score
22
Sorry for the delay in getting back to this...

First off, some time ago I reported that cylinders 3 and 4 showed zero leak off pressure, well that was because there was an extra Schrader valve in the line and no pressure was getting to the cylinder - DUH! With that taken care of I got the following data with 50 psi applied (piston was at TDC, any more pressure than that rotated the crank), #1 - 22, #2 - 34, #3 - 13, #4 -15, #5 - 45, #6 - 41, #7 - 22, #8 - 38 - which sort of correlates with the compression test results of before (1/180, 2/200, 3/120, 4/150, 5/210, 6/210, 7,185, 8/200). On all tests the only place I could detect air leaking was from the inlet manifold - but I might go back and repeat that.

I also pulled the intake manifold and put my cheap boroscope into the inlet, all looked remarkably clean (car has ~ 200k miles).

20220529091147.jpg20220529084217.jpg20220529084513.jpg

Lastly, I remove the cam followers on cylinder #3, all cam followers and the springs appeared fine.

I'm going to put some penetrating fluid on the exhaust bolts (manifold to downpipe) for the passenger side and give the above some more thought before pulling the head. It would have been nice to have a smoking gun to explain the low compression in cylinder #3. I'm leaning towards leaving the driver's side head alone - cylinder #7 leak off is concerning but the compression is OK.

Peter
 
Top