Should it be an Ex Expedition?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Yupster Dog

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Dec 7, 2018
Posts
1,330
Reaction score
868
Location
Virginia
You may have misunderstood.
MY BAD, just trying to inject a little hope that all everyones issues here have been heard. That change for the better (for once) may be on the horizon.

All right hope is cut off. Back to,
:Rant:
 

JasonH

Full Access Members
Joined
Nov 12, 2018
Posts
1,327
Reaction score
704
Location
Houston, TX
MY BAD, just trying to inject a little hope that all everyones issues here have been heard. That change for the better (for once) may be on the horizon.

All right hope is cut off. Back to,
:Rant:
The first step to fixing a problem is to acknowledge there is one. So from that perspective Farley is doing the right things. I just hope he can execute on their quality improvement initiatives because right now the brand name is being heavily tarnished.
 

JExpedition07

That One Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Posts
6,510
Reaction score
3,123
Location
New York
Ford really only shows love to the 3.5 EcoBoost and 5.0 Coyote these days in the F-150. Even their website showcases the V8 and 3.5 Eco on the main F-150 page and talks about them. You actually have to dig to find all the other motors. I wouldn’t say their engineering is over the top between them all. It’s a lot of carry over. The others are largely on the back burner. The 3.3 and 2.7 have sat untouched for years. The 3.0 diesel was just discontinued.

At the end of the day the a la carte engine approach has been pretty successful. All of them are shared between other platforms and it gives a feeling of customization.
 

Soliyou

Full Access Members
Joined
Jun 15, 2019
Posts
443
Reaction score
257
Location
OK
You may have misunderstood. One of his statements was that Ford has 25% more engineers to do the same work as competitors. He was saying that the engineering staffing is not efficient, and they either need higher productivity, or fewer people. It sounds as though you're under the impression that they're going to shift resources from accounting to engineering. I doubt this is the case, especially since EVs are less technologically complex and require fewer engineering resources. Plus, there's more overlap in product design for EVs, because the same modules and motors can be used across vehicles in different arrangements, rather than employing an entirely new powertrain. Ford has 5 powertrains (3.3 NA, 2.7T, 5.0, 3.5T, and 3.5T Hybrid) just for the F150, and variations on that same powertrain for the Bronco and Explorer (3.0T). I think the biggest push is to get more out of its existing engineering resources, which will facilate reduced headcount by improving productivity.

As for the quality. I don't know what Ford engineers have been smoking for the past several years. Many of its design decisions seem to be complete unforced errors. Camshaft timing, turbo plumbing, leaky manifolds, blowers that cause fires, shoddy camera connectors. It just seems like they really dropped the ball on durability in a variety of areas. And it's really sad, because the vehicles are great when they work properly. But lately, it's like a Land Rover, without the luxury and branding.

As an aside, my Expedition is at the stealership for low coolant, leaking turbo manifold, and a P0019 that only comes up while towing. Tech just called and said the chain is probably worn, and he can't diagnose it properly without removing the front engine cover. So now I have to decide whether to dump nearly 10K into this for timing and both manifolds, or get a new one. At 144K, I'm heavily leaning towards getting a 4th gen with an extended warranty, since the cam phaser issue appears to have been resolved and there's no guarantee that the fixes on this one will prevent something else from going wrong. There's just nothing else that can tow my camper as well.
My advice is to stay away… extended warranty won’t help with the bad customer service and shoddy dealer tactics, some of which are because Ford doesn’t properly reimburse the dealers for warranty work.

I generally do maintenance myself, but I am going through some health issues. I decided to take it in for an oil change and tire rotation. Guess what I got:
- only 5 quarts were put into the engine
- tires were not rotated (had a low tire that stayed in the same spot)
- scratches on the fender from technician leaning on the body to add the oil.

The service manager apologized and offered to correct the situation but it was too late.
 

Soliyou

Full Access Members
Joined
Jun 15, 2019
Posts
443
Reaction score
257
Location
OK
The last one was replaced at 118,000 21 months ago. The dealership said it's a rare failure. My coolant is low, so it's leaking into the cylinders or it's a very slow drip elsewhere in the system. I'm kind of hoping it's the head gasket because the dealership warrantied the repair for 24 months.
The head gasket on gen 1 ecoboost May fail when you are under boost most of the time. Basically if you tow a lot AND drive fast on the highway.

My friend had this happen to him. He tows a pretty big boat and is always on boost on the highway. His head gaskets failed and the dealer replaced them but the truck still overheated. He eventually traded it in with the dealer.
 

JasonH

Full Access Members
Joined
Nov 12, 2018
Posts
1,327
Reaction score
704
Location
Houston, TX
The head gasket on gen 1 ecoboost May fail when you are under boost most of the time. Basically if you tow a lot AND drive fast on the highway.

My friend had this happen to him. He tows a pretty big boat and is always on boost on the highway. His head gaskets failed and the dealer replaced them but the truck still overheated. He eventually traded it in with the dealer.
Thanks for sharing. I don't know if I should be glad that I'm not alone in experiencing this issue, or deeper disappointment at Ford's shoddy engineering. The strange thing is that I've never experienced overheating, even while towing on grades at 6,000 feet. In contrast many other owners have had issues in this area. Even when the head gasket was going, the excess smoke was the chief indicator. I suspect the head gasket is toast, because the dealership didn't call back again today and testing the coolant bottle for combustion gas should have been quick. They're likely looking for something else to point to as the cause of failure since that previous repair is under warranty until May. I'm inclined to upgrade with all the goodies...ARP studs, Full Race manifold, Intercooler, Powermax, high volume oil pump...as deep as they'll get into the engine for the head gaskets, timing chain, and turbo manifold...may as well go full bore with upgrades.
 
Top