A quick service, into disaster!

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Rob6805

Full Access Members
Joined
Mar 25, 2021
Posts
613
Reaction score
366
Location
49735
Disconnecting and capping the IWE vacuum lines will keep the hubs locked and engaged constantly. It does not mean that the vehicle is always in 4wd/AWD all the time. The transfer case can still be in 2wd mode and thus not send pwr to the front axle. Keeping the hubs engaged all the time would, as you mentioned, possibly reduce fuel economy.

I am surprised this is Ford's "fix" for this. They must know that the system is inherently faulty or they would just replace the IWE itself.
 

mreed112

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2013
Posts
24
Reaction score
13
Location
Grosse Ile, MI
I believe that the "fix" has been implemented in production.

As far as I can tell, my 2022 KR 4wd with HD trailer tow with 3.73 axles and ELSD has no IWE!

While fuel economy may be affected, I am happy with my 19mpg overall for 9k miles on reg fuel and 100% 2wd.
 

5280tunage

Full Access Members
Joined
Sep 17, 2019
Posts
1,496
Reaction score
868
Location
colorado
I'm reading this a bit differently, to me this tsb describes nothing more than a diagnostic procedure. I don't believe it's saying to leave the vacuum line disconnected permanently. especially the section under "labor times". To me this is a test procedure, to get the components to manually make the noises regardless of conditions, to determine if there is a IWE issue, then if the noise appears, to then proceed with the IWE replacement procedure or vacuum fixes. Maybe I'm way off though.
 

Rob6805

Full Access Members
Joined
Mar 25, 2021
Posts
613
Reaction score
366
Location
49735
I'm reading this a bit differently, to me this tsb describes nothing more than a diagnostic procedure. I don't believe it's saying to leave the vacuum line disconnected permanently. especially the section under "labor times". To me this is a test procedure, to get the components to manually make the noises regardless of conditions, to determine if there is a IWE issue, then if the noise appears, to then proceed with the IWE replacement procedure or vacuum fixes. Maybe I'm way off though.

Yes!! 100%. The clue is the section that the vacuum line disconnecting and capping is titled " Preform the vacuum system check procedure"

Good catch.
 

pickles1107

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2022
Posts
6
Reaction score
1
Location
alabama
Yes!! 100%. The clue is the section that the vacuum line disconnecting and capping is titled " Preform the vacuum system check procedure"

Good catch.
I’m not sure about that.
For our vehicles which do have a 4A option, the TSB instructs to skip to step 4.
I had the IWE failure and my service paperwork states that they removed the vacuum lines and capped, referencing this TSB. I questioned it at the time as my paperwork said something to the effect of “customer should be aware that vehicle will operate in 4A all the time now”.
I understand that is not 100% accurate, just that the hubs are engaged 100% of the time due to the absence of the vac system.

Here is a link to my original thread.
 

18MaxLimited

Active Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2020
Posts
42
Reaction score
14
Location
US
That plastic coolant junction was struck by something, which caused the broken section. Think a socket wrench handle end.
This. That plastic junction is no way the weakest point in the system to fail like that. A connection will likely fail or uncouple before that part would burst in that manner. VERY SUSPECT. Most warranties don't cover coolant hoses because right hoses dry out and leak over time but I'd argue this is NOT wear and tear and not a "hose."

That new bike chain rattling sound. Check this, just skip to 1:15
 

NSRacer

Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2020
Posts
6
Reaction score
1
Location
AZ
Those hoses failed on my Wife's 18 about a month ago. BUT, they failed at the crimp from rubber to plastic - not at that joint. That definitely looks like it was struck by something. I paid less than $100 for both hoses and replaced them myself. Process sucked a bit since it's tight, but since it's a part that's not covered by the extended warranty, I had to bite the bullet. I'd probably try to at least get the cost of the part waived...
 

nonsense

Active Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2013
Posts
35
Reaction score
11
Location
PNW
Similar heater hose broke on my wife's '11 and. I cut out the Y, replaced it with one from the parts store. The part and clamps cost under $10
 

3rd Expyowner123

Full Access Members
Joined
Apr 7, 2018
Posts
142
Reaction score
33
Location
78504
One of those hoses on our 2018 had a slow leak at a connector around 75k miles. Dealer replaced both, think the cost was about $450 if I recall properly.
Repair not covered my ESP.
 

Rob6805

Full Access Members
Joined
Mar 25, 2021
Posts
613
Reaction score
366
Location
49735
I’m not sure about that.
For our vehicles which do have a 4A option, the TSB instructs to skip to step 4.
I had the IWE failure and my service paperwork states that they removed the vacuum lines and capped, referencing this TSB. I questioned it at the time as my paperwork said something to the effect of “customer should be aware that vehicle will operate in 4A all the time now”.
I understand that is not 100% accurate, just that the hubs are engaged 100% of the time due to the absence of the vac system.

Here is a link to my original thread.
I read the TSB again and it does seem very vague and possibly interpreted different ways depending on the tech. I wouldn't worry too much about the vacuum lines being capped and the IWE's engaged all the time. The difference in fuel economy would be negligible.
 
Top