Auto stop benefit

[carymccarr]

due to frequent starts with no oil.

Yeah but that’s not how it works.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Wangle]

Yeah but that’s not how it works.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not sure what you mean. That IS how it works on my vehicle. My choice. You can use it however you want to.

 

[carymccarr]

Not sure what you mean. That IS how it works on my vehicle. My choice. You can use it however you want to.

The ASS doesn’t start the engine when it’s cold or when it ‘has no oil’. The engine is barely depressurized in most ASS starts and if the temp drops it starts up again.

Beyond that bearings are of a stronger material than they used to be as is the starter...not to mention higher tolerances and oil with higher levels of lubricants.

Unless you altered your expy that is how it works.

 

[StealthyBulldog]

makes the point that engineers are smart and have designed the engines to deal with the increased stress of repeated starts.

Those same engineers also made it so I had to drop the front bumper on my Escalade to change a headlight bulb! or an even better design was the old Mercury Sable with the lighted front grill, my Father in law had a bulb burn out in it, would have had to pull the rad to change it! Not disagreeing with your whole point, but I've met a lot of really stupid "smart" people in my life!

 

[Plati]

There is information available about concerns raised on this thread that can shed light on those concerns. Just showing it. Everyone is still entitled to whatever opinion they wish.

Autoweek seems credible?
https://autoweek.com/article/technology/what-auto-stop-start-autoweek-explains

http://bestride.com/research/buyers-guide/does-auto-stopstart-technology-wear-out-engine-components

https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-cars/stop-start-long-term-impact-your-car-s-engine

for a certain segment of the Forum reading population, discount this next reference because it has the word GREEN in the source, but the starter redesign details are there
https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1109687_dont-start-stop-systems-wear-out-your-cars-starter

IMHO .. common sense and gut feel aren't particularly useful when dealing with complex engineered systems that are Black Box to the uniformed. Its their choice.

 

[JExpedition07]

The reality is the most concentrated and quickly compounded engine wear is on cold and warm starts and remains to be so on AS/S vehicles. Oil companies and engine rebuilders have spent millions on research and have good reads available, they know their stuff and tear these engines down. Something these AS/S advocates don’t generally do, now I’m not saying as/s has no benefit fleet wide it does save fuel but it also increases wear. As the oil pump supplies and the crankshaft spins the oil fills the space between the journals and bearings, it floats in the oil film and doesn’t directly contact the bearings, this is hydrodynamic lubrication. Stopping the engine halts this process and the film the crank is floating in thins out and conforms to the roughness in the metallic part. This is boundary lubrication and at this point the peaks in the surface make contact with the bearings increasing wear to them when the crank begins to spin again on start up. Some manufacturers have a coating on the bearings to try and alleviate this but, but I don’t find any evidence Ford uses this coating on their cranks like the high performance imports do.

If one chooses to inform themselves on the wear portion from sources that aren’t in the business of lubrication or engine rebuilding (which relate to this increased wear) they are misinformed. Again AS/S does save fuel and has many benefits for fleets I’m not arguing that. Not to mention environmental benefits. But it also has many disadvantages when in use. Don’t blindly put faith in the engineers who couldn’t fit an oil pump rated for the job in mod motors or design a variable timing system that doesn’t break down fast. I’m just saying to think critically about the issue.

 

[JExpedition07]

The only other thing I’ll add is Ford does not use Auto/Start Stop on the Super Duty line where maximum reliability is their chief priority. I think they would have used it if it did not compromise anything, but because F-250 is not effected by the cafe standards it is not used. I’d argue this start stop is cafe standard driven. Anyway I will stop hammering on this technology now and don’t wish to derail the thread.

 

[aggiegrad05]

The only other thing I’ll add is Ford does not use Auto/Start Stop on the Super Duty line where maximum reliability is their chief priority. I think they would have used it if it did not compromise anything, but because F-250 is not effected by the cafe standards it is not used. I’d argue this start stop is cafe standard driven. Anyway I will stop hammering on this technology now and don’t wish to derail the thread.

It is very clear from your post that you know what you are talking about, so thank you for sharing your information. I don't disagree fundamentally with anything you said.

I agree these systems will cause increased wear on engine components. But I believe that manufacturers have taken steps to mitigate that increased wear. Are those steps sufficient to allow those components to make it to 250,000 miles? I doubt it. But I truly believe they have made a real effort to minimize the effect on the engine.

Yes, this is all about CAFE and government incentives. Ford is a for-profit company, not Green Peace. They are only going to develop and deploy a new system if it's worth it to their bottom line, not because it saves the whales. Which is why you don't see ASS in the Super Duty line, there is no incentive for them to add it. But if they can add ASS to their regular fleet, and pick up an incentive from Uncle Sam (without losing any sales, because no one is leaving Ford because of ASS), they will certainly do so and I don't begrudge them for it.

At the end of the day, leaving the ASS on is like recycling. It has really no tangible benefit to you personally and probably does entail some personal cost to you. You do it because you recognize that being part of a larger effort to take a little better care of our planet is worth buying an extra bin to hold recyclables or taking an extra walk to the curb to set out your blue bag. If you don't want to be part of that effort, or you believe the cost to you is not worth the benefit to everyone else, then throw your cans and bottles in the trash and buy your Eliminator.

And again, I do appreciate you taking the time to engage in a discussion, not a shouting match. Have a good day, @JExpedition07!

 

[blue oval guy]

I think if anything it will cause the high pressure fuel pump to fail early. All these new DI motors run at crazy high pressures 3600-3800psi +. Imagine all that pressure stopping and starting abruptly? Injectors, pumps and other fuel system problems would be my guess? starters are durability cycled a million times to prove reliability. As previously mentioned time will tell..
most guys here simply turn it off in their F-150's

 

[MxRacer965]

I hate this feature and bought the memorizer from 4D in case I was in a situation where I wanted it. I hate the sudden lurching associated with it when the vehicle starts back up, it isn’t much but it’s there. Maybe more so on the higher output Platinum I’m driving. It was most irritating as I’m pulling into my garage and have the motor shut off, then having to take my foot off more than I like to get started again. I could see that was a recipe for a potential bumper into the storage rack, followed by said rack falling into my Expedition and the wife’s MKS. If I’m in heavy traffic I may turn it back on but for normal driving here in West Michigan in the Grand Rapids area I’ll disable it. I forgot to disable it periodically so I bought the memorizer.