Transmission fluid change

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

TobyU

Full Access Members
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Posts
2,479
Reaction score
873
Location
Ohio
I hate hearing that as an answer and sort of agree and disagree at the same time. If the manufacturers really knew so much we'd never see vehicles break down, have recalls, TSBs, updated parts etc. Ideally the manufacturer certainly should know more. Maybe they do and keep the info to themselves for some reason. But that doesn't mean a particular shop wont have just as much if not more knowledge about one aspect or another of a vehicle. A run of the mill shop might also know that the manufacturer was forced and regulated to use a particular part or fluid to meet one standard or another when it reality it is not the best choice.

In my case when I bought my Expy with 92K miles I had a transmission shudder that I resolved by draining and refilling the fluid.

Completely agree!!!
This blind, blanket statement that many people use that the engineers that designed it or the manufacturer knows best is BULL.
Even if they KNOW best, they might or often don't publicize that info.
They do not have one goal (longevity) in mind. They have many parameters to design and goals to meet...and these don't remain constant from year to year.

The whole 5w20 oil is complete bogus as was 5w30 in the 80s and 90s for cars that came with and were previously designed for 10w30.
But people will argue that 5w20 is the best for a 1997 or 2003 4.6 or 5.4 BECAUSE ford says so or superseded the spec with a memo.
Luckily we have at least a few respected internet shop mechanics like makuloco that tell you to put 5w30 in the 5.4s.
 

Plati

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2016
Posts
2,781
Reaction score
1,367
Location
.
Completely agree!!!
This blind, blanket statement that many people use that the engineers that designed it or the manufacturer knows best is BULL.
Even if they KNOW best, they might or often don't publicize that info.
They do not have one goal (longevity) in mind. They have many parameters to design and goals to meet...and these don't remain constant from year to year.

The whole 5w20 oil is complete bogus as was 5w30 in the 80s and 90s for cars that came with and were previously designed for 10w30.
But people will argue that 5w20 is the best for a 1997 or 2003 4.6 or 5.4 BECAUSE ford says so or superseded the spec with a memo.
Luckily we have at least a few respected internet shop mechanics like makuloco that tell you to put 5w30 in the 5.4s.
So you believe one guy but don't believe the thousands of people at Ford. And you've now repeated it again (like all the others that repeated it) so some young kid can say "I read it all the time, must be true". Sort of like MSM or the guy telling people authoritatively to change tranny fluid every few thousand miles because of all that sensitive electronics in there. He doesn't even know what that means but Makuloco said it so it must be true and he repeats it like he has some first hand understanding. There's some Confirmation Bias here. Of course it's not exactly the same and that you have some anecdotal evidence from your own extensive experience.

Maybe it is true, I dunno. Just find the whole thing kinda self fulfilling.

I think you were on here the other day saying "for all practical purposes doesn't matter what viscosity oil you put in the rear diff".
 
Last edited:

TobyU

Full Access Members
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Posts
2,479
Reaction score
873
Location
Ohio
So you believe one guy but don't believe the thousands of people at Ford. And you've now repeated it again (like all the others that repeated it) so some young kid can say "I read it all the time, must be true". Sort of like MSM or the guy telling people authoritatively to change tranny fluid every few thousand miles because of all that sensitive electronics in there. He doesn't even know what that means but Makuloco said it so it must be true and he repeats it like he has some first hand understanding. There's some Confirmation Bias here. Of course it's not exactly the same and that you have some anecdotal evidence from your own extensive experience.

Maybe it is true, I dunno. Just find the whole thing kinda self fulfilling.

I think you were on here the other day saying "for all practical purposes doesn't matter what viscosity oil you put in the rear diff".
I did say that because it's rear end fluid and it won't make any difference. The key is to have enough in there and not have it contaminated. What brand, wait, synthetic or Dino will make no difference in the life of your rear end.
I don't believe makuloco just because he said it I just pointed out he's one person who happens to say the same thing that I have believed for years.
Chicken or the egg. My opinion came first through years of experience and information from others with their experiences garages, text, internet information Etc... Then he came along as I first heard his name about a year-and-a-half ago and he happens to agree with me on that theory and as I stated he is fairly well-respected so I will use him to further my personal belief.
When that kid you mentioned sees it on the internet I do want him to seem more and more people saying that 5w 30 is fine or even better to put in your modular Ford specifically pre 05.
I don't want him to blindly listen to the people that say you should follow Ford's recommendation I don't see how anyone can not see this. Ford does not have your best interest in mind.
Customer satisfaction, vehicle longevity, reduce maintenance cost... May very well be on their list of things but how they are prioritized is not disclosed and is not the same from vehicle line the vehicle line or year-to-year or decade to decade.
Too many people, getting as many miles out of their engine as they possibly can with absolutely zero internal repairs is their number one priority. Their number two priority is probably not having to do any transmission repairs. Their number three priority is probably the vehicle not rusting out including rusting brake lines and fuel lines.
Now people in nice salt-free environments don't have to worry at all about number three so they can have a higher priority like not having abnormalities with electrical systems and functions that don't work 100% correctly 100% of the time.
Manufacturers have to straddle the fence and have to design things for many different parameters and goals.
There are always compromises made. When you do the research or have lots of experience with a certain type of engine like I do with the 4.6 and 2 valve 5.4 you can negate some of these compromises and stack the deck in your favor for your own priorities.
I will go on to say that I can absolutely guarantee you that if you take 500 4.6 town car engines or 5.4 2 valve Expedition engines and run them on 5w 20 and take 500 more and run them on 5w 30 or 10w 30 ... That you will have fewer internal wear issues or lubrication problems with the 5w30 and 10w30 then you will with the 5w20. You may have no issues with any of the engines. In that case if you tore them apart and started measuring and looking for where you would find more wear with the 5:20. the 5w20. I absolutely guarantee it.
But yet since ford came out and superseded their 5w30 recommendation with 5w 20 people that follow and tout manufacturer's recommendations will say you should run 5w 20 in your 4.6 and that it's the best oil for them.
I have never agreed and I'm just happy that people with some popularity like makeuloco says the same thing.
 

Plati

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2016
Posts
2,781
Reaction score
1,367
Location
.
I did say that because it's rear end fluid and it won't make any difference. The key is to have enough in there and not have it contaminated. What brand, wait, synthetic or Dino will make no difference in the life of your rear end.
I don't believe makuloco just because he said it I just pointed out he's one person who happens to say the same thing that I have believed for years.
Chicken or the egg. My opinion came first through years of experience and information from others with their experiences garages, text, internet information Etc... Then he came along as I first heard his name about a year-and-a-half ago and he happens to agree with me on that theory and as I stated he is fairly well-respected so I will use him to further my personal belief.
When that kid you mentioned sees it on the internet I do want him to seem more and more people saying that 5w 30 is fine or even better to put in your modular Ford specifically pre 05.
I don't want him to blindly listen to the people that say you should follow Ford's recommendation I don't see how anyone can not see this. Ford does not have your best interest in mind.
Customer satisfaction, vehicle longevity, reduce maintenance cost... May very well be on their list of things but how they are prioritized is not disclosed and is not the same from vehicle line the vehicle line or year-to-year or decade to decade.
Too many people, getting as many miles out of their engine as they possibly can with absolutely zero internal repairs is their number one priority. Their number two priority is probably not having to do any transmission repairs. Their number three priority is probably the vehicle not rusting out including rusting brake lines and fuel lines.
Now people in nice salt-free environments don't have to worry at all about number three so they can have a higher priority like not having abnormalities with electrical systems and functions that don't work 100% correctly 100% of the time.
Manufacturers have to straddle the fence and have to design things for many different parameters and goals.
There are always compromises made. When you do the research or have lots of experience with a certain type of engine like I do with the 4.6 and 2 valve 5.4 you can negate some of these compromises and stack the deck in your favor for your own priorities.
I will go on to say that I can absolutely guarantee you that if you take 500 4.6 town car engines or 5.4 2 valve Expedition engines and run them on 5w 20 and take 500 more and run them on 5w 30 or 10w 30 ... That you will have fewer internal wear issues or lubrication problems with the 5w30 and 10w30 then you will with the 5w20. You may have no issues with any of the engines. In that case if you tore them apart and started measuring and looking for where you would find more wear with the 5:20. the 5w20. I absolutely guarantee it.
But yet since ford came out and superseded their 5w30 recommendation with 5w 20 people that follow and tout manufacturer's recommendations will say you should run 5w 20 in your 4.6 and that it's the best oil for them.
I have never agreed and I'm just happy that people with some popularity like makeuloco says the same thing.
Ok. I respect you have an opinion and a lot of experience. I think you said the viscosity wouldn't make a difference in the rear diff ... Between 2 different viscosities. Me, I'd ensure the manufacturer specified viscosity is in there.

Makuloco also advised very frequent changes of every fluid in the Expy like 30k for transmission I think and 3k for oil. Do you agree with those frequencies and changing the brake fluid? I think he is advising the most frequent possible fluid changes for everything. Front rear diff transfer case etc. I expected him to advise changing wiper fluid and battery acid next.

My main Experience with Expys is 3 of them with 5.4 engines 450k miles with zero engine problems following manufacturer reccs or a bit sooner. Like ... I change plugs at 80k. I don't know enough to write my own specifications so for me I try to follow manufacturer specs and also listen to my trusted local shop because they done good for me so far. I also hate to waste money so I don't opt for fluid changes that I feel have low probability of gaining me anything. Some people reason you can't go wrong changing fluids early so why not. Not me.

I gotta admit. I'm not a big fan of Conspiracy Theories so a red flag is raised when I think I'm hearing one. So when someone says the auto manufacturers are out to get you I see a red flag.

But there is NO question you know more about engines and auto repair than I do. I once doubted you on snowblower winterizing but came around to your advice, at least part of it.
 
Last edited:

TobyU

Full Access Members
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Posts
2,479
Reaction score
873
Location
Ohio
Ok. I respect you have an opinion and a lot of experience. I think you said the viscosity wouldn't make a difference in the rear diff ... Between 2 different viscosities. Me, I'd ensure the manufacturer specified viscosity is in there.

Makuloco also advised very frequent changes of every fluid in the Expy like 30k for transmission I think and 3k for oil. Do you agree with those frequencies and changing the brake fluid? I think he is advising the most frequent possible fluid changes for everything. Front rear diff transfer case etc. I expected him to advise changing wiper fluid and battery acid next.

My main Experience with Expys is 3 of them with 5.4 engines following manufacturer reccs or s bit sooner. Like I changed my plugs at 80k.

I gotta admit. I'm not a big fan of Conspiracy Theories so a red flag is raised when I think I'm hearing one. So when someone says the auto manufacturers are out to get you I see a red flag.

But there is NO question you know more about engines and auto repair than I do.
I only have a lot of experience with certain engines. There are so many cars out there that I've never even open the hood on it.
Also, just because a guy is good at one doesn't mean you should value his opinion on everything. I used to have frequent contact with a GM Master Tech who knew everything there was to know about General Motors Vehicles. He could take any of the Transmissions apart and fully rebuild them etc and that's especially in the transmission world.
He called me one day and I literally laughed at him when he asked me a question about a Ford Taurus! He's like, dude I don't know anything about Ford's I don't work on them and I've never owned one.
So some people are out there giving blanket advice about things that might not be true.
A safe bet is to follow the manufacturer recommendations or do things a little bit earlier because most cars are lasting a long time now anyway so you don't really have to maximize every mile you can get out of one. Few new car purchasers keep the vehicle until the engine life is is used up at over 200,000 miles.
Some of us only buy old cars though so we do look to maximize things since from the start we have a shorter possibility of lifespan.
Some people put way too much thought into it like being picky about what brand of everything they put on their car or what brand of oil. There are still people that won't use certain brands of oils or have their preference. In reality, it's more about the viscosity and the frequency of oil changes and it's not going to affect the life of your engine regardless of which brand you use.
The thing about the differential fluid is that there's only two this guy sees really readily available so either thing you grab is going to be okay. The next part of the problem is that Ford started out selling vehicles and recommending a certain viscosity but then later on changing their mind when these vehicles are 8 or 10 years old and then saying to use the other viscosity in the new ones and even all the old ones.
This was not because they found out they were having a lot of differential failures in the first 10 years so they switched, more than likely it was just because they only want to carry one type of gear lube for their dealers and it just makes it uniform and simpler.
Also, most people will tell you that the 75-140 full synthetic is the best gear lube to put in any with differential because it is better band The Cars That only spec for the 80w 90 but there are people that will tell you and there have been test confirm but in certain applications the ring and pinion and metal parts inside actually get hotter with the synthetic oil than they do with the plain old 80w 90 that we have been using for a hundred years in cars.
So this is where you really can't believe either side to fully. Do you have to go with your own personal experience unless you know someone very closely who has personal experience or cars at your job or whatever. Usually there is no real experience because hardly anyone has ever had a differential failure due to improper Lube. Any damage that has ever occurred to one has been contaminated Lube or not enough Lube.
So my parsley joke full comment was grabbing a bottle of gear lube it looks like gear lube and it's really all going to work the same. You could also pour straight Lucas in there which has the same shape bottle and it even says that for noisy or warm ones you can use it at 100%. I wouldn't do it to a good one but I don't think it would damage one.
I have not washed all his videos or recommendations but from what you said it sounds like he is a little overzealous on some things.
Not on oil changes though. We have this back-and-forth thing. For years people didn't change their oil very often and then when all the Quick Lube oil change places came out pioneered by Jiffy Lube I think oh, I can still sing the song, they convinced the American people that it was necessary to change your oil every 3 months or 3000 miles. We find out now that that was Overkill and that the 5 to 7500 manufacturer recommendations for normal service was just fine. Now however with VVT we are finding that the high end of manufacturer recommendations cannot be the best thing overall.
You need to increase the oil change frequency and or use a fully synthetic oil to keep the all clean and their screens from getting all clogged up and causing you problems with the solenoids.

Flushing your coolant really doesn't do a whole lot. It makes people feel better to look in the cap and see nice pretty green fluid or on the newer things the other colors but I have owned vehicles that were 13 to 15 years old that had never had the fluid changed in their lives and you can't drive them on a thousand mile trip and they wouldn't overheat a bit.
Nice cars most cars it will make little difference whether you changed and flush the fluid in the radiator and cooling system every 3 years or every 10 years. It just won't make a difference .
now there are some cars that have problems to start with where it will slow down your frequency of problems. So this is the conundrum. now there are some cars that have problems to start with Where it will slow down your frequency of problems. So this is the conundrum. If you have a car with spurious electrical current getting in your cooling system it will rot away your heater core faster. If you change your radiator fluid and keep high-quality coolant like Preston in there every two to 3 years you should get a few more years out of it. But having said that, most heater cores on most cars go 15 to 20 years before they start to leak. Some never leak.
The 95 to 97 Town Cars had a fairly wimpy radiator and if you didn't flush the coolant and four to five years that would be enough restriction or coating inside the radiator that it would overheat.
if you flushed it regularly and use one of the cleaners you would probably get another three or four years before the radiator need to be replaced.
I had one that did it consistently every four years. I did not flush it after the first radiator went in but it had fresh coolant. Exactly four years later it started overheating again so I warranted the lifetime warranty radiator and put new coolant in it again.
Flushing power steering fluid is a waste of time on most cars you would be better off to add one of the higher-end additive and leave it be. Most people really start thinking about flushing until they have stiffness or a problem and a flush rarely solve that issue.
Flushing your brake fluid is an absolute waste of time and money but it makes people feel better.
I can't tell you how many 15 to 20 year old plus cars I have had that have never had the brake fluid flushed. Over the years when you do brake jobs and bleed them a couple of pumps you do manage to flush a little bit through but I mean they've never had an entire master cylinder flush through or empty cleaned out and flush through the lines with brand-new fluid. Your calipers well stick on their sliders, Pistons will Rust away or the phenolic ones will crack or things will just start leaking way before you'll ever have an issue in your brake system because you didn't flush your fluid.
The theory of brake lines rusting from the inside is an old wives tale. Unless you left a quart of brake fluid out with the lid off and it true in a lot of moisture which I think you would actually have to pour water into it to get enough moisture, and then poured it into your brake system, you are not going to get rust from the inside out. I have done more brake lines in my life than most other human beings because I have maintained a fleet of town cars and limousines for myself and two other people for the past 25 years. Every limo ever built will have to have brake lines and typically fuel lines replaced before the vehicle is sold off into private use or goes to the scrap yard.
The last Town Car stretch I replace brake lines on needed 34 ft to do both rear ones. The rear are the only ones ever rust out as the fronts are still in their Factory configuration and they are stainless. So when I do a brake line it's a lot of brake line.
I used to believe or at least thought it was possible that they rusted from the inside but I started checking them. Now this only applies in this salt States they might make it long enough to rust from the inside out in a nice dry no salt environment but I have never, ever remove a rusted out leaking brake line that when you inspect three or four different areas on the line and cut it in half with a tubing cutter ... the outside is flaked off rust has holes all in it and is either leaking or ready to leak at any given moment but as you get to the inside you hit nice shiny white clean Steel.

We have to go with whatever works for us and what has worked but sometimes will never actually know if we've always done something one way and had good results it doesn't mean it's the only way. Other people hardly do anything or do these people be different I get the same results or even better than we do.
All I know is that I don't lie or make up shit. That's why I get frustrated and double down when somebody wants to contradict me on a forum. If I tell you that's the way it's been for me repeatedly over and over you can take it to the bank at that is exactly how it occurred. Of course, this does not guarantee any results for you or in your neck of the woods but some things are pretty consistent.
That's why I don't care about other people talking about facts or spewing statistics. If they don't match what I have experienced in the past four decades of working on cars then they mean nothing to me and they had nothing to do with my decision making future process.
 

Plati

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2016
Posts
2,781
Reaction score
1,367
Location
.
I only have a lot of experience with certain engines. There are so many cars out there that I've never even open the hood on it.
Also, just because a guy is good at one doesn't mean you should value his opinion on everything. I used to have frequent contact with a GM Master Tech who knew everything there was to know about General Motors Vehicles. He could take any of the Transmissions apart and fully rebuild them etc and that's especially in the transmission world.
He called me one day and I literally laughed at him when he asked me a question about a Ford Taurus! He's like, dude I don't know anything about Ford's I don't work on them and I've never owned one.
So some people are out there giving blanket advice about things that might not be true.
A safe bet is to follow the manufacturer recommendations or do things a little bit earlier because most cars are lasting a long time now anyway so you don't really have to maximize every mile you can get out of one. Few new car purchasers keep the vehicle until the engine life is is used up at over 200,000 miles.
Some of us only buy old cars though so we do look to maximize things since from the start we have a shorter possibility of lifespan.
Some people put way too much thought into it like being picky about what brand of everything they put on their car or what brand of oil. There are still people that won't use certain brands of oils or have their preference. In reality, it's more about the viscosity and the frequency of oil changes and it's not going to affect the life of your engine regardless of which brand you use.
The thing about the differential fluid is that there's only two this guy sees really readily available so either thing you grab is going to be okay. The next part of the problem is that Ford started out selling vehicles and recommending a certain viscosity but then later on changing their mind when these vehicles are 8 or 10 years old and then saying to use the other viscosity in the new ones and even all the old ones.
This was not because they found out they were having a lot of differential failures in the first 10 years so they switched, more than likely it was just because they only want to carry one type of gear lube for their dealers and it just makes it uniform and simpler.
Also, most people will tell you that the 75-140 full synthetic is the best gear lube to put in any with differential because it is better band The Cars That only spec for the 80w 90 but there are people that will tell you and there have been test confirm but in certain applications the ring and pinion and metal parts inside actually get hotter with the synthetic oil than they do with the plain old 80w 90 that we have been using for a hundred years in cars.
So this is where you really can't believe either side to fully. Do you have to go with your own personal experience unless you know someone very closely who has personal experience or cars at your job or whatever. Usually there is no real experience because hardly anyone has ever had a differential failure due to improper Lube. Any damage that has ever occurred to one has been contaminated Lube or not enough Lube.
So my parsley joke full comment was grabbing a bottle of gear lube it looks like gear lube and it's really all going to work the same. You could also pour straight Lucas in there which has the same shape bottle and it even says that for noisy or warm ones you can use it at 100%. I wouldn't do it to a good one but I don't think it would damage one.
I have not washed all his videos or recommendations but from what you said it sounds like he is a little overzealous on some things.
Not on oil changes though. We have this back-and-forth thing. For years people didn't change their oil very often and then when all the Quick Lube oil change places came out pioneered by Jiffy Lube I think oh, I can still sing the song, they convinced the American people that it was necessary to change your oil every 3 months or 3000 miles. We find out now that that was Overkill and that the 5 to 7500 manufacturer recommendations for normal service was just fine. Now however with VVT we are finding that the high end of manufacturer recommendations cannot be the best thing overall.
You need to increase the oil change frequency and or use a fully synthetic oil to keep the all clean and their screens from getting all clogged up and causing you problems with the solenoids.

Flushing your coolant really doesn't do a whole lot. It makes people feel better to look in the cap and see nice pretty green fluid or on the newer things the other colors but I have owned vehicles that were 13 to 15 years old that had never had the fluid changed in their lives and you can't drive them on a thousand mile trip and they wouldn't overheat a bit.
Nice cars most cars it will make little difference whether you changed and flush the fluid in the radiator and cooling system every 3 years or every 10 years. It just won't make a difference .
now there are some cars that have problems to start with where it will slow down your frequency of problems. So this is the conundrum. now there are some cars that have problems to start with Where it will slow down your frequency of problems. So this is the conundrum. If you have a car with spurious electrical current getting in your cooling system it will rot away your heater core faster. If you change your radiator fluid and keep high-quality coolant like Preston in there every two to 3 years you should get a few more years out of it. But having said that, most heater cores on most cars go 15 to 20 years before they start to leak. Some never leak.
The 95 to 97 Town Cars had a fairly wimpy radiator and if you didn't flush the coolant and four to five years that would be enough restriction or coating inside the radiator that it would overheat.
if you flushed it regularly and use one of the cleaners you would probably get another three or four years before the radiator need to be replaced.
I had one that did it consistently every four years. I did not flush it after the first radiator went in but it had fresh coolant. Exactly four years later it started overheating again so I warranted the lifetime warranty radiator and put new coolant in it again.
Flushing power steering fluid is a waste of time on most cars you would be better off to add one of the higher-end additive and leave it be. Most people really start thinking about flushing until they have stiffness or a problem and a flush rarely solve that issue.
Flushing your brake fluid is an absolute waste of time and money but it makes people feel better.
I can't tell you how many 15 to 20 year old plus cars I have had that have never had the brake fluid flushed. Over the years when you do brake jobs and bleed them a couple of pumps you do manage to flush a little bit through but I mean they've never had an entire master cylinder flush through or empty cleaned out and flush through the lines with brand-new fluid. Your calipers well stick on their sliders, Pistons will Rust away or the phenolic ones will crack or things will just start leaking way before you'll ever have an issue in your brake system because you didn't flush your fluid.
The theory of brake lines rusting from the inside is an old wives tale. Unless you left a quart of brake fluid out with the lid off and it true in a lot of moisture which I think you would actually have to pour water into it to get enough moisture, and then poured it into your brake system, you are not going to get rust from the inside out. I have done more brake lines in my life than most other human beings because I have maintained a fleet of town cars and limousines for myself and two other people for the past 25 years. Every limo ever built will have to have brake lines and typically fuel lines replaced before the vehicle is sold off into private use or goes to the scrap yard.
The last Town Car stretch I replace brake lines on needed 34 ft to do both rear ones. The rear are the only ones ever rust out as the fronts are still in their Factory configuration and they are stainless. So when I do a brake line it's a lot of brake line.
I used to believe or at least thought it was possible that they rusted from the inside but I started checking them. Now this only applies in this salt States they might make it long enough to rust from the inside out in a nice dry no salt environment but I have never, ever remove a rusted out leaking brake line that when you inspect three or four different areas on the line and cut it in half with a tubing cutter ... the outside is flaked off rust has holes all in it and is either leaking or ready to leak at any given moment but as you get to the inside you hit nice shiny white clean Steel.

We have to go with whatever works for us and what has worked but sometimes will never actually know if we've always done something one way and had good results it doesn't mean it's the only way. Other people hardly do anything or do these people be different I get the same results or even better than we do.
All I know is that I don't lie or make up shit. That's why I get frustrated and double down when somebody wants to contradict me on a forum. If I tell you that's the way it's been for me repeatedly over and over you can take it to the bank at that is exactly how it occurred. Of course, this does not guarantee any results for you or in your neck of the woods but some things are pretty consistent.
That's why I don't care about other people talking about facts or spewing statistics. If they don't match what I have experienced in the past four decades of working on cars then they mean nothing to me and they had nothing to do with my decision making future process.
Yer a good man MrToby. Id buy you a cup of coffee if I had the chance which I won't.
 

762mm

Full Access Members
Joined
Aug 28, 2019
Posts
639
Reaction score
390
Location
Quebec, Canada
So you believe one guy but don't believe the thousands of people at Ford. And you've now repeated it again (like all the others that repeated it) so some young kid can say "I read it all the time, must be true". Sort of like MSM or the guy telling people authoritatively to change tranny fluid every few thousand miles because of all that sensitive electronics in there. He doesn't even know what that means but Makuloco said it so it must be true and he repeats it like he has some first hand understanding. There's some Confirmation Bias here. Of course it's not exactly the same and that you have some anecdotal evidence from your own extensive experience.

Maybe it is true, I dunno. Just find the whole thing kinda self fulfilling.

I think you were on here the other day saying "for all practical purposes doesn't matter what viscosity oil you put in the rear diff".


Was that directed at me? If so, I'll have you know I do all my own maintenance and have been for 20 years now... and I have a few friends or close acquaintances that have been wrenching on cars & trucks at different dealerships for many more years, with whom I often have these conversations. Excuse me if I trust them a little more than some gullible "see no evil, hear no evil, Ford has my best interests at heart" elderly internet dude.

You can put fermented cat piss in your own transmission and differentials at 300k, for all I care. What I do know to be true from personal experience is that the "recommended 150k trans fluid and filter change" from FoMoCo is ********. I the warranty on the trans 150k miles or more? Didn't think so! I did mine at 132k after buying the truck and the fluid was definitely contaminated, with crap stuck on the pan magnet and the filter housing being covered in grey metallic sludge. The filter media was black on the inside of the filter as well, thus causing a guaranteed restriction to the trans oil pump.

More restriction = less flow = more wear on oil pump + worse shifting and more wear on other components. Doesn't take an Einstein to understand this, although some on here still appear to struggle with the idea.


Lo and behold, after changing the filter and fluid, the truck shifts smoother and actually gets slightly better gas mileage. Must be another "conspiracy theory", riiight?


:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

TobyU

Full Access Members
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Posts
2,479
Reaction score
873
Location
Ohio
Was that directed at me? If so, I'll have you know I do all my own maintenance and have been for 20 years now... and I have a few friends or close acquaintances that have been wrenching on cars & trucks at different dealerships for many more years, with whom I often have these conversations. Excuse me if I trust them a little more than some gullible "see no evil, hear no evil, Ford has my best interests at heart" elderly internet dude.

You can put fermented cat piss in your own transmission and differentials at 300k, for all I care. What I do know to be true from personal experience is that the "recommended 150k trans fluid and filter change" from FoMoCo is ********. I the warranty on the trans 150k miles or more? Didn't think so! I did mine at 132k after buying the truck and the fluid was definitely contaminated, with crap stuck on the pan magnet and the filter housing being covered in grey metallic sludge. The filter media was black on the inside of the filter as well, thus causing a guaranteed restriction to the trans oil pump.

More restriction = less flow = more wear on oil pump + worse shifting and more wear on other components. Doesn't take an Einstein to understand this, although some on here still appear to struggle with the idea.


Lo and behold, after changing the filter and fluid, the truck shifts smoother and actually gets slightly better gas mileage. Must be another "conspiracy theory", riiight?


:rolleyes:

I agree with you on not listening to forward because they don't have your best interest at heart but I will say that I have had plenty of cars that have never had the transmission changed that go 200 to 250 Thousand Miles and they're still working just fine.
You almost always feel smoother shifts and better torque converter clutch engagement with fresh fluid. That is why most Fords get changed because of torque converter shudder.

I have also been wrenching on cars for 40 years and I can guarantee you that the gray sludge and metal on the magnet inside is not an indication of where or excessive wear or anything wrong with your transmission. That's just a sign but it was new at one time or rebuilt at one time and the magnet did its job and collect the particles from the initial clutch pack swearing-in. Every transmission we'll have that the first time it's taken apart and the magnet clean. It will have it when it's new shortly after you put some miles on it, and it will have it after a rebuild. It doesn't mean that it should be taken out and cleaned.
But it's nice to get that initial we're out of there. It's just like changing the oil in the first few hundred miles on a new engine or a freshly rebuilt one. They do not recommend it now because it's bad marketing but in the old days, and many engine builders will still tell you, you want to change the oil early on. The most where that ever occurs in an engine and the most metal particles and stuff that wears off ends up in the oil occurs right after the new engine is first run or right after a fresh rebuild.
People will argue that you're no longer need to do this because of manufacturing tolerances, clearances, oils Etc but the fact is that manufacturers just don't want to tell you to do something that is not customer-friendly and people have accepted this as being good
If you really, really, really care about your brand new 2020 Corvette Supercar, you will change that expensive and probably large amount of oil and the first thousand miles.
 

Plati

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2016
Posts
2,781
Reaction score
1,367
Location
.
Was that directed at me? If so, I'll have you know I do all my own maintenance and have been for 20 years now... and I have a few friends or close acquaintances that have been wrenching on cars & trucks at different dealerships for many more years, with whom I often have these conversations. Excuse me if I trust them a little more than some gullible "see no evil, hear no evil, Ford has my best interests at heart" elderly internet dude.

You can put fermented cat piss in your own transmission and differentials at 300k, for all I care. What I do know to be true from personal experience is that the "recommended 150k trans fluid and filter change" from FoMoCo is ********. I the warranty on the trans 150k miles or more? Didn't think so! I did mine at 132k after buying the truck and the fluid was definitely contaminated, with crap stuck on the pan magnet and the filter housing being covered in grey metallic sludge. The filter media was black on the inside of the filter as well, thus causing a guaranteed restriction to the trans oil pump.

More restriction = less flow = more wear on oil pump + worse shifting and more wear on other components. Doesn't take an Einstein to understand this, although some on here still appear to struggle with the idea.


Lo and behold, after changing the filter and fluid, the truck shifts smoother and actually gets slightly better gas mileage. Must be another "conspiracy theory", riiight?


:rolleyes:
Canadian Dude, calm down. Go smoke some of that legal Canadian weed or have a Old Vienna with your favorite danseuses and chill. Elderly? Ha, my Dad is 95 ... Now he's elderly. I'll bet you $100 I could beat you down the hill at Tremblant or in a sledmobile to the next bar or even whip yet butt at 1 on 1 in bball or ping pong too. So there.

All I said was about the question on sensitive electronics question. Think about it. Focus.

When I get home I'm changing tranny fluid front rear diff and transfer case fluid (my mechanic will anyway) in my 2014EL at 100K because 1) I can 2) won't have to worry about it until I hit 200K 3) that baby is my second home and I'm not gonna mess around 4) some guy on the internet said so

Do they still sell OV splits up there. By the bucket .. on ice?

Geez
 

gtncpa

Full Access Members
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Posts
175
Reaction score
46
Location
NJ
Your right, I have known a few people(myself included) on flushing trans fluid when a vehicle is just below the 200k mark and after the change the trans wouldn't shift right, which tells you that it needed the "crap" that was in the fluid to work properly.
I had this exact problem on my Mountaineer. I also change the transfercase fluid and it had slight vibration after that. I now have 2017 Expi and 2017 Fusion Sport. I am hesitant to change the fluids.
 

Gregg Eshelman

Full Access Members
Joined
Jun 13, 2018
Posts
127
Reaction score
30
Location
Idaho
The transmission in my 07 EL is hesitating a bit on shifts, mostly when cold. Been getting a bit worse. Problem is I don't have a way to lift it up level to do the fluid level check, or a way to get new fluid into the transmission.

For some reason all those aftermarket dipsticks cost over 2x the price for the Expedition and F-150 despite being less than 2x the length of the ones for cars like Mustangs. Debating whether to buy one for a fluid and filter change I'll most likely only ever do once, or paying someone else to scorch a hand on the catalytic converter.

I do want to put a bottle of Lucas in with the new fluid. It did wonders for my 97 Taurus. When I bought it with 92K miles it would SLAM into first gear. With Lucas plus new fluid and filter it was instantly much better and quit slam shifting after a couple of weeks.
 

lbv150

Full Access Members
Joined
Mar 12, 2011
Posts
606
Reaction score
284
Location
Northeast
Just remember the manufactures are in the business of selling new vehicles, their maintenance schedules in the manuals are designed to get the vehicle past its warranty period. If the vehicles were to last a long time, no one would buy new ones. Think about that. I'm one who swears by 3K engine oil changes and have torn apart engines that had zero gunk or even cylinder wear at 150K plus. Engines still had the factory crosshatch in the cylinders and zero wear at the top of the cylinder wall.
 

TobyU

Full Access Members
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Posts
2,479
Reaction score
873
Location
Ohio
Just remember the manufactures are in the business of selling new vehicles, their maintenance schedules in the manuals are designed to get the vehicle past its warranty period. If the vehicles were to last a long time, no one would buy new ones. Think about that. I'm one who swears by 3K engine oil changes and have torn apart engines that had zero gunk or even cylinder wear at 150K plus. Engines still had the factory crosshatch in the cylinders and zero wear at the top of the cylinder wall.

But I thought the people say you should exactly follow the manufacturers recommendations for everything because they and the engineers who designed it know (and always tell you) how to make it last the longest!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Plati

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2016
Posts
2,781
Reaction score
1,367
Location
.
[/QUOTE]Just remember the manufactures are in the business of selling new vehicles, their maintenance schedules in the manuals are designed to get the vehicle past its warranty period. If the vehicles were to last a long time, no one would buy new ones. Think about that. I'm one who swears by 3K engine oil changes and have torn apart engines that had zero gunk or even cylinder wear at 150K plus. Engines still had the factory crosshatch in the cylinders and zero wear at the top of the cylinder wall.[/QUOTE]


I'm not saying you're wrong, in suggesting that 3K oil changes will result in less engine wear than 15K 10K 5K or a larger number than 3K .... However ... from a technical standpoint isn't that equivalent to saying "I always fill my gas tank when it's 1/2 empty and I have never run out of gas" ?

How would they know that 3/4 or 1/4 empty would have the same result as 1/2 empty?

Now I know this math doesn't apply to home mechanics but but for people who have their oil changed at a shop ... if life of engine is 300K and oil changes cost $60 ... 6K oil changes will save you 50 oil changes vs 3K or $3000. The 3K oil change interval is a $3000 insurance policy.
 
Last edited:

richs fishes

Full Access Members
Joined
May 20, 2019
Posts
123
Reaction score
24
Location
Long Island, NY
Just remember the manufactures are in the business of selling new vehicles,

Anybody watch Scotty Kilmer on Youtube? No idea where he gets his info and/or if its always correct, but hes been a mechanic for years and presents info in a great way for the internet. But he recently said that data shows car manufacturers now actually make more money repairing their vehicles than selling them. It was on the topic of whether or not manufacturers should be allowed to keep their repair data private and/or charge independent mechanics for the info.
 

TobyU

Full Access Members
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Posts
2,479
Reaction score
873
Location
Ohio
Just remember the manufactures are in the business of selling new vehicles, their maintenance schedules in the manuals are designed to get the vehicle past its warranty period. If the vehicles were to last a long time, no one would buy new ones. Think about that. I'm one who swears by 3K engine oil changes and have torn apart engines that had zero gunk or even cylinder wear at 150K plus. Engines still had the factory crosshatch in the cylinders and zero wear at the top of the cylinder wall.[/QUOTE]


I'm not saying you're wrong, in suggesting that 3K oil changes will result in less engine wear than 15K 10K 5K or a larger number than 3K .... However ... from a technical standpoint isn't that equivalent to saying "I always fill my gas tank when it's 1/2 empty and I have never run out of gas" ?

How would they know that 3/4 or 1/4 empty would have the same result as 1/2 empty?

Now I know this math doesn't apply to home mechanics but but for people who have their oil changed at a shop ... if life of engine is 300K and oil changes cost $60 ... 6K oil changes will save you 50 oil changes vs 3K or $3000. The 3K oil change interval is a $3000 insurance policy.[/QUOTE]
There are nany different ways to look at it. And all theories can have some merit. There is no one right or wrong answer as some people want to make it seem.
The fuel filling and start entirely different debate. I have a friend or two that gripes at me all the time because I run every car I own all the way until 0 miles till empty until I buy gas. I rarely have fuel pumps fail.
Last one I had go out was in 2015 on a 2000 vehicle so it wasn't like it failed prematurely.
There is some argument that allowing the sending unit to work at least 90% of its full range is better for it then only allowing it to move a lesser amount.
I will say that the worst thing you could do for the sending units especially GM's cuz they have all kinds of problems with them would be to put it at one spot let's say right on half and add gas every two days to your vehicle so it always sits in the same relative small spot and moves back and forth.
I have taken GM's apart and seen the small fine wire wrapped around the basically piece of cardboard like plastic and scene where the little finger has worn Through the Wire.
I was able to use tweezers to wrap it back together and solder it and get the sending unit working again. It wasn't quite as accurate as before but it was within 10%.
That part wasn't available new or from the dealer As A Separate Peace and I certainly wasn't going to buy a brand new fuel pump just to get the gas gauge to work.
I ran a 40 foot MCI Diesel Pusher bus for over 3 years that didn't have a fuel gauge. It held 144 gallons and I never once filled it up.
I did run out of gas twice before I figured out to grab me a stick off a tree and break it off just the right length. I would stick that in the tank all the way down and pull it out to see how much gas I had left. If I had under 3 inch on the stick I better get some diesel.
I didn't run out after that. It doesn't hurt them to run out of fuel but it's annoying the way you have to Prime them to get them to start back.
Now let me tell you the ultimate paradoxical story about oil changes or lack thereof.

I bought a truck with a V10 Ford in it from the original owner with 86000 miles on it in 2007 July.
Apparently he never changed the oil because it was 3 quarts low when I bought it. It was barely on the tip of the stick and the things hold 7 quarts if you fill them to the full mark.
But it sounded great and ran perfectly for the twelve hundred mile trip home.
It was also 3000 to $5,000 under market value so any issues or a moot point.
Now I didn't drive the vehicle the whole lot. The most I ever put on it with 7-8k miles in one year but most were no more than 5,000 maybe 6.
Now we all know about amsoil cllaiming 15 or 20 thousand mile oil changes and for the past good number of years mobile one with their extended oil claims 15000. This was back in 2007 so I'm not quite sure the mobil one was pushing that at the time.
But you get the idea that it's becoming more and more acceptable for these long-term oil changes so... It didn't make me feel too bad when I neglected what used to be my normal oil changes.
So by December of 2013 I think I had change the oil three times, for If I was lucky, or if it was lucky. Now I had probably added a quart several times during that time frame but I don't think I ever ran Marvel's or anything like that.

Now had I been doing a proper maintenance schedule like I used to on all the cars I really cared about oh, I would have changed the oil at least twice a year. Minimum. If I were putting a lot of miles on it I would have changed it every four to five thousand.
I always ran full synthetic and this usually mobil one.
I do the oil changes myself but even at Walmart I ended up buying to 5 quart jugs because it's just a rip-off to buy one or two singles and at the prices at the time it was about $23 for each jug and then $4 for the filter. So about 53 for an oil change. Because I never end up having that oil left over when it's time to change it again. When you top off a V10 all the way to the full Mark which I do ends up being 7 qts despite what ford or anyone else says. Their recommendation only puts you a quarter to Half Way in the crosshatch mark. Even if you have the proper dipstick because yes, there was a TSB on some of those but not on this particular engine.
I would end up using the oil for top offs for multiple cars so it was cost me $53 maybe 55 for an oil change Plus about 30 to 45 minutes start to finish to do it all and clean everything up.

Okay, now the fun math part.
So I rarely ever change the oil and around December 14th or whatever Saturday there was there a couple weeks before Christmas, the engine seized up with a hundred and thirty-three thousand miles on it.
So I went from 86000 to 133 in six and a half years.
Now I really don't know if I would have got any longer life out of it had I have changed the oil religiously but if I would have known there was such a sludge problem or a caramelized hard bricked up peanut brittle looking stuff inside the engine valve covers, I could have used an engine flush twice and Marvel's Mystery Oil and maybe, just maybe, the pickup tube would not have gotten clogged up and I could have drained the crap out and it wouldn't have blown up or at least would have lasted longer.
Had I've got another four to five years out of it the engine could have gone to the junkyard with the rest of the rusty vehicle.
But back to the math part, $53 / oil change Plus on average let's say 42 minutes of time.
If I had done it like I used to that would have been at least 13 oil changes even just based on time.
That's $689 not counting if I had to maybe buy a new oil change drain pan or maybe oil plug gasket or two.
But we'll stick with 689.
And total time spent for all the oil changes would be 9.1 hours.

So I was a slacker and didn't do any of this and lost an engine. So as I said I don't use the vehicle that often but I did need it occasionally and certainly couldn't sell it for much with a blown engine so I pushed it home bumper to bumper and I priced several engines and they were going for between 1200 $2,000 for decent used ones.
I wasn't in a hurry so I waited and one day about 4 months later one popped up.
50 miles from home like I had a low mile one out of a recently wrecked moving van with the transmission for the low low great price of $500.
He even had a stack of Maintenance records and it had one mobil 1 its entire life because his son-in-law was the opposite of me and was quite OCD about taking care of vehicles.
I kind of had to convince the guy to let me go get it that night because it was getting late but I didn't want anyone to buy it out from under me. So I got there shortly after dark and he was a super nice guy and he loaded it up for me on the back of my truck with a bobcat he owned.
He knew he was selling it cheap and he said his son-in-law even said he should ask more but he said he just didn't care, I think he got an insurance settlement and he just wanted to help someone out. I thanked him immensely and still do.
So I bought the engine for 500 with the transmission remember, went and bought a cheap Harbor Freight engine hoist for $100 with the coupon since the last engine I did was 15 years ago or more in a jeep and we just picked it up with a tow strap and a steel pipe and set it on the frame because there were no fenders on the Jeep CJ5 and when I was in my teens switching Motors in GTOs I would just go two blocks up the street and rent an engine hoist for like $26 for 4 hours.
So I bought the engine and transmission, the engine hoist, oil pan gasket, exhaust manifold gaskets, 20 new grade 8 bolts and lock washers for these manifolds, intake manifold gasket set, new oil filter, 2 5 quart jugs of full synthetic oil at Walmart, and two gallons of Prestone antifreeze. I also had to buy an 8mm tap and some new drill bits to drill out for the exhaust manifold studs that broke since I was replacing the gaskets since I had the engine out because these things are known to have gasket leaks.
The thing had fresh plugs in it because it was highly maintained and I just checked them to make sure number loose and one was a little looser than I would have liked but everything was good there.
Total expenses were 746.99. I have it all written down because I'm lazy but I'm a numbers cruncher.
So then since I had this awesome 5 R 110 transmission that goes behind the big diesels , and I had no use for it, I sold it in 3 days for $375 to a guy in Columbus. That was a really good price and he was happy to quickly come get it.
So I just kept the good cheap parts wheel turning from the engine seller to me and to the guy with the transmission.
So I had $371.99 in an engine replacement.
That's $317 cheaper than if I would have done the oil changes myself!
It's crazy, and I really wouldn't recommend doing it but the numbers don't lie.
Sadly, this reminds me a lot of the new theory on lawn mowers and outdoor power equipment, they're all disposable. Briggs & Stratton says never need oil changes. They just want you to top it off and when it blows up by another one.
Now just to be accurate let's figure in labor rate for my time. It would have been 9 hours a time to do all those 13 oil changes and it did take me longer than 9 hours total to do the engine swap. I had one hour there in one hour back to buy it, I have one hour to go by the engine hoist. Of course that's something I will have for the rest of my life. I had a couple of hours and the trip to drive the drill bits and the parts at the parts store and the oil at Walmart.
But I had a few extra hours over the 9 to do the whole job. It took about 45 to pull it out since I never pulled one out of an Excursion before and it's kind of tall and the engine hoist is kind of short. That I had three or four hours of engine stand work and clean up and then it took me five or six to put it back in.
But I probably didn't have over 10 extra hours in it versus just doing as all changes because it did not figure the time going to the store buying the oil filter and oil for the oil change in with the oil changes which you would if you wanted to be highly OCD and accurate.
But the $317 depending on what labor rate I want to pay myself or claim I'm worth equates to over 10 extra hours labor at $30 an hour. Most mechanics don't make $30 an hour. A lot of guys that work at home on the side charge that because that's a great deal since garages charge 75-110 but the mechanic is lucky to get 25 tops.

So by the math and even by the time because most people don't make $30 an hour at their real jobs not. I had an overall better Financial experience my neglecting the engine and not doing oil changes and then replacing the entire engine and I ended up with an engine with 25k fewer miles!
It's absolutely crazy ass-backwards way to do it but it does prove true on paper.
The main reason was though because I was very lucky getting that deal on the engine and transmission.
So as with everything in life I always say it's all relative. Relevant to me finding that deal that it just dropped in my lap. Relative because who's to say the first engine would have ever blown up really. Relative to if I might have used Marvel's and changed the oil more often it might not have blown up or it might have dislodged a bunch of Gunk and clogged up even sooner. I could have lost an engine in 3500 miles. You can lose an engine right after putting some of that fast flush in it.
So who knows???
But them's the facts as I experienced em.

It's probably just my best way of rationalizing my crazy extra amount of work but when you really look at all the numbers... I actually came out ahead in all areas.
Do I want to do it again, do I plan on going through this with other vehicles? No I do not. Because easy and comfortable is better fan risky, unknown timetable, and not guaranteed similar Financial outcome.
Good money and good bet is on taking care of your stuff and using a decent or high quality motor oil and not letting it go past 6000 miles and even more importantly don't let it get low because if you're letting your oil get extremely low down below the add Mark or barely on the stick whether it's three thousand miles or six thousand miles, you are really contaminating, coking, and burning up the oil that's in there.
I feel that the bigger problem with higher mile intervals between oil changes that actually just the higher miles. If you're always on the full mark and you go 7500 miles is not nearly as bad as if your oil is a quart to a quart and a quarter low and you go an extra 2000 from let's say 3000-5000 with it being low.
Sorry for another book but you guys know I'm a wordy SOB.
 
Last edited:

TobyU

Full Access Members
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Posts
2,479
Reaction score
873
Location
Ohio
After seeing at post and having to scroll down four screens to see how much I did put in there, it's probably my record post on this forum. Sadly not my record post ever.
Hey, I had a phone call with a good friend the other night that I really hadn't talked to in a good while maybe a year-and-a-half or so. We might have text a couple of paragraphs back and forth but hadn't really talked. We were on the phone 3 hours 52 minutes and 21 seconds. It felt like 45.
We didn't cover everything either. We only briefly touched on building codes and additions, Trump, politics, major national disasters, religious Rapture and Armageddon, the new Corvette, the downward reliability of new engines especially after variable valve timing oh, which he noted that he had to replace a 5.4 because of cam phasers and stuff, the new style automatic transmissions like in the Corvette and Porsches, electric cars being faster than gasoline despite the fact Battery Technology still sucks and we still hate Electric... and that's about all we covered in almost four hours.
We didn't even get to discuss anything personal to ourselves, our lives, or my recent local area 6-8 brand donut comparison taste test.
That will have to be next phone call.
 

Plati

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2016
Posts
2,781
Reaction score
1,367
Location
.
MrToby ... That post was so long I had to hire somebody to read it for me!

That engine probably blew because the guy before you ran it out of oil, not because you didn't do 3k oil changes. Right?
 
Top