Took home a 2025 Tremor to go along side my 2025 Raptor

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

ExpiRaptor

New Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2025
Posts
2
Reaction score
6
Location
Wisconsin
Excited to have them both. I’ve ran through a dozen cars here this year.. but I’ve ended the year the way I should have started with a 2025 Expedition Tremor and a 2025 Raptor. More pics to come, it’s dark out and just got home.

Other strictly SUVs this year I owned are the following that I can provide pros/cons with:

2024 Subaru Ascent
2024 BMW XM
2025 Hyundai Ionic 5 N
2025 Chevy Tahoe (5.3)
2025 GMC Yukon (3.0)
2025 Ford Explorer ST-Line

IMG_0905.jpeg
 

dlcorbett

Full Access Members
Air Force
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Posts
3,086
Reaction score
1,149
Location
tx
What's your comparison between the yukon and expy, what you like about over the other and vice versa about dislikes.
 
OP
OP
E

ExpiRaptor

New Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2025
Posts
2
Reaction score
6
Location
Wisconsin
Yukon (had Supercruise)
Pros:
1. Early resale increased. High demand vehicle with the 3.0. I put 7k miles on it and traded it in for $200 more than I paid for it new. Reminded me of the COVID years.

2. Supercruise was great.

3. Legit got 28+mpg easily.

4. Animated lighting was a nice touch.

5. I enjoyed the column shifter.

6. Air suspension was great.

Cons: (this is applicable to both Tahoe and Yukon)
1. Seats are terribly uncomfortable. Too stiff, no give. Limited adjustments.

2. Materials are a lesser “soft touch” compared to the Expedition. Overall, materials in the Yukon & Tahoe at different trim levels felt a lot cheaper. There were more rattles.

3. The premium smooth non-air suspension in the Tahoe is far more bumpy and stiff. I’d imagine this would feel identical in a non-air ride Yukon.

4. A number of early dealer visits in both. I view most of my dealer trips as acute vs likely wide spread so I won’t get into the details unless you’d want them.

5. The bench seat options are limited and locked to certain trims and configurations in Tahoe/Yukon/Escalade in almost hilarious ways while you can get a bench in any configuration with the Expedition.

6. The def refuel came up 3 times in 7k miles. Not a huge deal, but my last Duramax took 6k-7k to see it the first time. Given our miles on the Yukon were mostly highway, not sure why this would be.

7. Audio system is noticeably bad compared to the B&O. Lacks bass and the biggest issue being clarity of vocals at higher levels.

8. Another grief attributable to both vehicles. Neither feel “next gen” on the inside and both give off feelings of vehicles 20+ years older after a while.

9. Second row seat tumblers are a bad design element that continues into 2026.

10. This is applicable to both vehicles although specific to our Tahoe we had the bench and oddly in both middle seats there are no headrests. A weird omission.

11. No phone as key. Keycards are now available for MY26 but the digital key is the way of the future and my preference.

12. The hood sits up much higher than on the Expedition which results in more difficult to visualize parking moments. In the Ford when the sensors come on the front view camera immediately pops up. In the GMs it will show you sensor position but you need to physically tap the camera button to see the front camera which I think should come on the same way as the Ford.

I could probably rattle off a bunch of more details. These are some easy ones. By and large the Expy is both subjectively and objectively better in every way sans potentially resale although I feel with the Tremor that may be lessened a bit.
 

aggiegrad05

Full Access Members
Joined
Nov 6, 2017
Posts
1,834
Reaction score
1,392
Location
North Texas
Yukon (had Supercruise)
Pros:
1. Early resale increased. High demand vehicle with the 3.0. I put 7k miles on it and traded it in for $200 more than I paid for it new. Reminded me of the COVID years.

2. Supercruise was great.

3. Legit got 28+mpg easily.

4. Animated lighting was a nice touch.

5. I enjoyed the column shifter.

6. Air suspension was great.

Cons: (this is applicable to both Tahoe and Yukon)
1. Seats are terribly uncomfortable. Too stiff, no give. Limited adjustments.

2. Materials are a lesser “soft touch” compared to the Expedition. Overall, materials in the Yukon & Tahoe at different trim levels felt a lot cheaper. There were more rattles.

3. The premium smooth non-air suspension in the Tahoe is far more bumpy and stiff. I’d imagine this would feel identical in a non-air ride Yukon.

4. A number of early dealer visits in both. I view most of my dealer trips as acute vs likely wide spread so I won’t get into the details unless you’d want them.

5. The bench seat options are limited and locked to certain trims and configurations in Tahoe/Yukon/Escalade in almost hilarious ways while you can get a bench in any configuration with the Expedition.

6. The def refuel came up 3 times in 7k miles. Not a huge deal, but my last Duramax took 6k-7k to see it the first time. Given our miles on the Yukon were mostly highway, not sure why this would be.

7. Audio system is noticeably bad compared to the B&O. Lacks bass and the biggest issue being clarity of vocals at higher levels.

8. Another grief attributable to both vehicles. Neither feel “next gen” on the inside and both give off feelings of vehicles 20+ years older after a while.

9. Second row seat tumblers are a bad design element that continues into 2026.

10. This is applicable to both vehicles although specific to our Tahoe we had the bench and oddly in both middle seats there are no headrests. A weird omission.

11. No phone as key. Keycards are now available for MY26 but the digital key is the way of the future and my preference.

12. The hood sits up much higher than on the Expedition which results in more difficult to visualize parking moments. In the Ford when the sensors come on the front view camera immediately pops up. In the GMs it will show you sensor position but you need to physically tap the camera button to see the front camera which I think should come on the same way as the Ford.

I could probably rattle off a bunch of more details. These are some easy ones. By and large the Expy is both subjectively and objectively better in every way sans potentially resale although I feel with the Tremor that may be lessened a bit.
Thanks for taking the time to put this together, appreciate it.
 

sanman28

Full Access Members
Joined
Jun 24, 2019
Posts
346
Reaction score
248
Location
SW MO
We had a similar experience before buying our 25 expy. The new yukon we drove for a week didnt feel "next gen" compared to the 21' we already owned. I liked it, yes, and it was a fine vehicle. But just wasnt new enough....and we arent really dedicated to any maker or model.
 

LG_123

Full Access Members
Joined
Nov 1, 2019
Posts
159
Reaction score
76
Location
Toronto
That is a ton of vehicles to buy in one year haha. More than I’ve bought in a lifetime
 

ronSarz

Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2025
Posts
7
Reaction score
1
Location
Michigan
We drove and like the Tremor but the 1360 lb max payload limits travel trailer towing. The sunroof is not needed but cannot delete it. That would give some relief. Do not understand why they give more HP and cooling when the payload is so limited. Very disappointed.

That is quite the 1-2 punch you have there!
 

dlcorbett

Full Access Members
Air Force
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Posts
3,086
Reaction score
1,149
Location
tx
I think it has something to do with the suspension and how it was designed. Also, the split gate adds more weight now since it extends the payload floor.
 
Top