Is all the "fuel saving" tech really worth it in the long run?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

OP
OP
762mm

762mm

Full Access Members
Joined
Aug 28, 2019
Posts
639
Reaction score
388
Location
Quebec, Canada
Actually that's not a way to see if something is legit.
Another faulty analysis. I wont try to help you understand why.

Also … you now agree that Climate Change is real.
This is weird.


I never said it isn't happening. What I am saying is that :

A) It's been happening ever since this sorry rock in space came to exist some 4 billion years ago and ;

B) Human activity has negligible impact on it, as other much more powerful & natural factors are at play... those same natural factors that we are somehow not allowed to discuss as per the main stream minions, because "the science is settled" in their scared minds.


Overall, nothing major is going to happen. The end is NOT near and the planet's long-term history tells us so. Take Obama, the high priest of the Church of Climate Change : he just invested his retirement fund into a 15-million dollar beach front property! Those in the know, know better...


As for cashing in on scared sheeple who believe the World is about to end, this idea (business model) is as old as humanity itself... so excuse me for being skeptical!

;)
 
Last edited:

TobyU

Full Access Members
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Posts
2,479
Reaction score
869
Location
Ohio
Based on your exhaustive analysis that’s all that matters.
No. Only if you have loads of experience and data that you, in your own realm of the world, are impossibly fun; then you are.
If you have evidence from many other people in your area that you are than you probably are.
You might not be impossibly fun at all somewhere else, BUT the odds of you continuing to be impossibly fun in your area and to those people is a much more accurate predictor than someone else rating or gauging your "impossibly fun %".

Water boils at 212F right? Some people would say that is a fact but they are over generalizing.
Water boils at 212F at standard temperature and pressure. They forget to add this.

The temp of water boiling is -relative- as is your being impossibly fun and the likelihood of AVERAGE failure rate or lifespan.

Heck, on most of my stuff, I am so rough on it that I cut the expected in half and hope to get that!
 

Plati

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2016
Posts
2,782
Reaction score
1,364
Location
.
"Climate Change denier"... lol, that's original! o_O

Well, I guess there's a sucker born every minute. I strongly recommend you look into the science behind ice cores that they pull out of Antarctica to measure climate changes over millennia. What do they tell us about the weather in the long run? Also, check out the science of solar cycles and how they impact the Earh. The Sun is in full blast mode right now, by the way... sending much more heat energy our way than in recent past. The changing tilt of the Earth as it circles the Sun is also a fun fact to look at, as it shifts hot zones on the planet. It does this in a cyclical fashion every few thousand years, like clockwork. The magnetic poles shift is also another factor that influences "climate changes". Again, this is a cyclical and natural phenomenon. None of it has ANYTHING to do with humans, despite the money-grab socialist propaganda!

Do yourself a favor and look at these before you compare people like me to crazy kooks... because otherwise you are the ignorant "the end is coming" preacher at a street corner!


Have fun with your carbon taxes, they will surely "save the Earth" from your non-existing boogeyman. The Earth and the solar system do what the they have been doing for hundreds of millions of years, whether you accept it or not... Calling me a "denier" of your sect's climate gospel won't change the facts either.


(nice religious term, by the way! Who's the crazy religious kook, again?)

;)
All Conspiracy Theories aside, the one situation that seems "concerning" to me … and I don't know what the implications are going to be down the road …. is atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. This is a graph going back 1000 years or so, looks bad.
https://www.co2levels.org/
graph.jpg


There are other graphs similar that go back 800,000 years using ice core samples
 
Top