4WD Change for 2017?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

star-art

Full Access Members
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Posts
539
Reaction score
156
Location
Pacific Northwest
I noticed in the sales brochures that 2017 EL 4WD trucks come with a limited-slip rear axle. As far as I know, that was not available on older models. According to the Ford sales brochures, it was not available on any Expedition in 2015 or 2016. That is why I was narrowing my search to just 2017 trucks.

When I posted this in another thread, someone asked a very good question:

Did 2017 lose the braking bias assisted 4WD? That’s what kept the limited slip out of the expedition was the two systems would be fighting back and forth. Expeditions equipped with advancetrac didn’t get a limited slip rear but it could be optioned on them without before.

That's a very good question! I sure hope the addition of this option is an improvement and not an attempt to cut corners in order to save money. I may be about to pull the trigger on a 2017 so I'd sure like to know. Any thoughts?

Thanks!
 

JExpedition07

That One Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Posts
6,530
Reaction score
3,140
Location
New York
Stole this from the other thread I had posted it in:

Either way I’m sure you’ll be fine. Both systems are there to achieve the same thing..... the only reason I raise this question is if that’s the case you’d only have that “limited slip” effect on the rear vs on both front and rear with the braking bias.

The limited slip is designed to start sending a percentage of power to the wheel with traction when slip starts

The braking bias senses slippage and applies friction to the slipping wheel forcing the conventional open diff to throw a percentage power to the wheel with traction, this has been one of the signatures of the control trac II system. Both are achieving the same thing in the end.... you can now see why these two systems don’t play nicely together.


Let me ask you this, what is the axle code on the door (on VIN sticker)? If you can tell me that Ill be able tell you exactly what axle ratio and diff you have.
 

Black

Full Access Members
Joined
Mar 26, 2018
Posts
1,376
Reaction score
640
Location
Kentucky
Looks like starting in 2016 the EL 4x4 started coming standard with the limited slip differential and 3.73 gear set.

Here is the 2016 brochure stating as such.
https://www.ford.com/services/assets/Brochure?make=Ford&model=Expedition&year=2016&postalCode=65613

The 2015 brochure lists all rears being non limited slip but the EL coming standard with 3.73
https://www.ford.com/services/assets/Brochure?make=Ford&model=Expedition&year=2015&postalCode=65613

Personal preference I prefer a limited slip setup over brake bias.
 

AllBoostNoEco

Full Access Members
Joined
May 2, 2017
Posts
328
Reaction score
196
Location
GA
All 15-17 use the AdvanceTrac with RSC, which is the brake-bias system being referenced. In my 2015, it’s proven plenty reliable at dividing power between the wheels.
While I can get a one-wheel spin effect during cornering if it’s hard enough to unload the inside rear wheel, if I stay on the gas it always transitions into a nice little power-slide with both tires spinning.
In dirt or mud situations where a limited-slip wouldn’t have the internal bias to overcome the traction disparity, this system consistently works well.

That being said, you can have both. They really don’t fight each other at all and could even be considered complementary. As all the AdvanceTrac does is brake a spinning wheel to more evenly split the torque, that function is not changed by presence of a limited slip or even a locker. It means it doesn’t have to brake as hard to achieve that even torque split, as the limited-slip does most of the work, and the computer will be supplementing that. In situations where the traction disparity is great enough to overcome the bias of a limited-slip (one wheel in mud or on ice, the other on pavement), the brake bias system will kick in, gently brake the traction-limited wheel, limited-slip bias is reduced and the limited-slip functions as designed.

The F-150 offers both a locking differential and limited-slip, and they use the same AdvanceTrac system.
 

JExpedition07

That One Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Posts
6,530
Reaction score
3,140
Location
New York
Advance Trac is not exactly the braking bias I mention although it’s sesnors are what make the magic happen. The Super Duty and F-150 are equipped with advance trac RSC but do not receive braking bias assisted 4WD. Only vehicles with ControlTrac II receive this (Expedition, Explorer, F-150 Limited). Ford isn’t stupid so some how some way they make everything mesh in the EL.
 
Last edited:

AllBoostNoEco

Full Access Members
Joined
May 2, 2017
Posts
328
Reaction score
196
Location
GA
Advance Trac is not exactly the braking bias I mention although it’s sesnors are what make the magic happen. The Super Duty and F-150 are equipped with advance trac RSC but do not receive braking bias assisted 4WD. Only vehicles with ControlTrac II receive this (Expedition, Explorer, F-150 Limited). Ford isn’t stupid so some how some way they make everything mesh in the EL.
Thanks for the clarification. I knew about the ControlTrac in the older Expeditions, but didn’t realize they continued it when they did away with the viscous coupling and replaced it with the computer-controlled clutch pack in the transfer case. Further research hasn’t proven that not to be the case.
I made the mistake of assuming since my 2013 F-150 had an open diff and I could never get that thing to spin just one tire the systems were the same.

Didn’t the guy who built his 07 or 08 Expedition with the custom Icon coilovers and custom bumpers (Aspen?) add air lockers to his without issue? I haven’t looked in a while, so I can’t recall if he ever actually gave feedback on his or not.
 

JExpedition07

That One Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Posts
6,530
Reaction score
3,140
Location
New York
Thanks for the clarification. I knew about the ControlTrac in the older Expeditions, but didn’t realize they continued it when they did away with the viscous coupling and replaced it with the computer-controlled clutch pack in the transfer case. Further research hasn’t proven that not to be the case.
I made the mistake of assuming since my 2013 F-150 had an open diff and I could never get that thing to spin just one tire the systems were the same.

Didn’t the guy who built his 07 or 08 Expedition with the custom Icon coilovers and custom bumpers (Aspen?) add air lockers to his without issue? I haven’t looked in a while, so I can’t recall if he ever actually gave feedback on his or not.

He may have I’m not sure, but a locker shouldn’t negatively effect anything because that is forcing both wheels to lock together in motion so I’d think the brakes just wouldn’t have to kick in all together when it’s locked. You may be correct on the limited slip and advance trac being able to compliment each other..... The difference is a locker is locked by us as the driver in advance, whereas a limited slip is reacting to the situation just as the brakes are.... so the effects are less predictable. As far as control trac it’s still used.
 
Last edited:

deweysmith

Full Access Members
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
574
Reaction score
206
Location
Montreal, QC
Only vehicles with ControlTrac II receive this (Expedition, Explorer, F-150 Limited).

The only vehicles that had ControlTrac II were Explorer and Escape. It's been replaced with Intelligent 4WD. It used a viscous coupling and wasn't nearly as great as plain ol' ControlTrac, which is still used on the 2018 Expedition (albeit updated a bit.)
 

JExpedition07

That One Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Posts
6,530
Reaction score
3,140
Location
New York
The only vehicles that had ControlTrac II were Explorer and Escape. It's been replaced with Intelligent 4WD. It used a viscous coupling and wasn't nearly as great as plain ol' ControlTrac, which is still used on the 2018 Expedition (albeit updated a bit.)

The 18’ system was downgraded a tad. No more 4High mode and only optional 4 Low mode. Looks like you are correct on the terminology, they updated the control trac a ew times but didn’t rename it, just calling the front wheel drive based one II.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
S

star-art

Full Access Members
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Posts
539
Reaction score
156
Location
Pacific Northwest
According to the owner's manual, 2018 Expeditions apparently do have a "4H" option, but there's no button for it and it's not clear how it's activated. 2018 Expeditions with 4WD that don't have the Heavy-Duty Tow package get "2H" and "4A" buttons on the console. HD Tow comes with an "electronic limited-slip" rear axle and adds "4L" and rear locking differential buttons around the "Drive Mode" knob.

4H (4X4 HIGH) Provides electronically locked four-wheel drive power to front and rear wheels. The information display will display 4H when this mode is selected. This mode is not recommended for use on dry pavement. This mode is only intended for severe winter or off-road conditions, such as deep snow, ice or shallow sand.

Note: 4H may turn on or off automatically based on Drive Mode selection. In certain configurations, 4H-like functionality is contained within specific off-road Drive Modes even when the indicator lamp shows 4A. See Drive Control (page 252).
 

JExpedition07

That One Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Posts
6,530
Reaction score
3,140
Location
New York
According to the owner's manual, 2018 Expeditions apparently do have a "4H" option, but there's no button for it and it's not clear how it's activated. 2018 Expeditions with 4WD that don't have the Heavy-Duty Tow package get "2H" and "4A" buttons on the console. HD Tow comes with an "electronic limited-slip" rear axle and adds "4L" and rear locking differential buttons around the "Drive Mode" knob.

There is not really a functioning 4x4 High mode on the 18’ expy, it’s non existent. The 4A is what they refer to as 4H because it isn’t a low range gear selection. It is NOT a fully locked 4x4 High selection splitting torque 50/50 all times as we have, it’s techinally not even 4x4 it’s AWD. 4x4 Low is not standard and is an upgrade item. We have 2H 4A 4H 4L as it should be when you option 4WD on a full size vehicle.
 
Last edited:

Plati

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2016
Posts
2,781
Reaction score
1,367
Location
.
Snowplow guy out in Park City last winter was telling me that no trucks are REALLY 4WD. He didnt explain it very well so I never figured out what he was talking about. Seemed to have something to do with one wheel spinning and the other not. Is TRUE 4WD just all 4 wheels are locked and turning the same or does anyone know the point he was trying to make?
 

Boostedbus

Full Access Members
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Posts
747
Reaction score
465
Location
Maryland
Snowplow guy out in Park City last winter was telling me that no trucks are REALLY 4WD. He didnt explain it very well so I never figured out what he was talking about. Seemed to have something to do with one wheel spinning and the other not. Is TRUE 4WD just all 4 wheels are locked and turning the same or does anyone know the point he was trying to make?
He was probably saying most 4x4 vehicles have at least an open differential in the front meaning 3 wheels driving at once at best. That’s if it has a locking rear differential or a limited slip that’s not slipping in the rear differential.But his statement is not always true because I installed a Detroit locker in the front and a Traction Lok in the rear with 4.10 gears in my 95 F150....... all 4 pull unless my clutches in the traction Lok are slipping .... he’s probably talking about most stock vehicles
 
Last edited:

bobmbx

Full Access Members
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Posts
1,200
Reaction score
627
Location
Virginia
Snowplow guy out in Park City last winter was telling me that no trucks are REALLY 4WD. He didnt explain it very well so I never figured out what he was talking about. Seemed to have something to do with one wheel spinning and the other not. Is TRUE 4WD just all 4 wheels are locked and turning the same or does anyone know the point he was trying to make?
Back in the day when 4WD was a utility and not a fashion statement, there would always be two wheels spinning at the same rate....locked together. One of them would be on the front, and one on the back. There was no differential between front and rear. Side to side, yes.

Snowplow guy is taking liberty with the term"4WD". He's right, in the sense that all 4 wheels aren't spinning at the same speed. "4WD" means that all four wheels can be driven. Whether they are or not is up to the system that controls it. And, back in the day, it was purely mechanical. Manual locking hubs and a transfer case shifter. And you had to be stopped and in neutral to engage the front.

Today, the traction control systems can apply power to any wheel based on what senors are telling it, and they even meter the power to each wheel. Very fancy stuff compared to a 1949 Willys or a Bronco from the '60s.

Any vehicle that has all 4 wheels locked together (unless its a super-modified vehicle, like a rock crawler) is going to break something. Period.
 

Muddy Bean

Full Access Members
Joined
Oct 19, 2017
Posts
818
Reaction score
508
Location
Michigan
I personally don’t understand why you’d want to narrow your search to a 2017 truck that might be thousands of dollars more than a comparable 2015 or 2016 just to have a somewhat obscure option that may not actually affect your normal daily life much?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 

Plati

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2016
Posts
2,781
Reaction score
1,367
Location
.
Thanks & yes Stock Vehicles. I'll have to study up on "differential" and "limited slip". I'm still learning.

I think that was his point sort of, but if one wheel stops turning at all ... which does seem to happen ... some potential traction being lost I think. Obviously I know squat though.
 

Boostedbus

Full Access Members
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Posts
747
Reaction score
465
Location
Maryland
Back in the day when 4WD was a utility and not a fashion statement, there would always be two wheels spinning at the same rate....locked together. One of them would be on the front, and one on the back. There was no differential between front and rear. Side to side, yes.

Snowplow guy is taking liberty with the term"4WD". He's right, in the sense that all 4 wheels aren't spinning at the same speed. "4WD" means that all four wheels can be driven. Whether they are or not is up to the system that controls it. And, back in the day, it was purely mechanical. Manual locking hubs and a transfer case shifter. And you had to be stopped and in neutral to engage the front.

Today, the traction control systems can apply power to any wheel based on what senors are telling it, and they even meter the power to each wheel. Very fancy stuff compared to a 1949 Willys or a Bronco from the '60s.

Any vehicle that has all 4 wheels locked together (unless its a super-modified vehicle, like a rock crawler) is going to break something. Period.
A Detroit locker unlocks in a turn if you are off the gas to keep from breaking stuff or traction ,you’ll hear it ratchet , but get on throttle and it will lock under torque. Traction Lok or limited slip has clutches that slip in turns for the same reason. Now if you have a Spool differential like I have in my 69 Cougar Eliminator and all of my ATV’s ,then yes in a turn if it doesn’t break traction then it will break something else mechanical. Spools don’t unlock.
 

mossback

2017 Limited EL
Joined
Oct 9, 2017
Posts
359
Reaction score
176
Location
WA state
... And, back in the day, it was purely mechanical. Manual locking hubs and a transfer case shifter. And you had to be stopped and in neutral to engage the front.

A distant memory from the mid 90's: locking the front hubs on my Bronco II during snow storms and such... Good times.

I'm old fashioned for sure but I'll always prefer having a manual 4x4 selector with 4H and 4L.
 
OP
OP
S

star-art

Full Access Members
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Posts
539
Reaction score
156
Location
Pacific Northwest
I personally don’t understand why you’d want to narrow your search to a 2017 truck that might be thousands of dollars more than a comparable 2015 or 2016 just to have a somewhat obscure option that may not actually affect your normal daily life much?


I also wanted something with the lowest miles possible. I tend to keep my vehicles for a very long time (7 years for the last one, 10 years before that). This may be the last truck I ever buy so I wanted it to be as close to "new" as I could get. I couldn't find any 2015 or 2016 models around here with really low miles. . .
 

Boostedbus

Full Access Members
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Posts
747
Reaction score
465
Location
Maryland
Technically a limited slip differential is supposed to be a little harder on fuel VS an open diff because of the resistance to unlock clutches in turns. I’m sure it’s very minimal but I thought I’d was worth mentioning.
 
Top