Car and driver ranked all large suvs, mainstream and luxury, except the land cruiser/lx570 ironicallly, ill let you guys form your opinion on it, but i def dont feel or understand what they wrote:
https://www.caranddriver.com/flipbook/big-hauling-every-full-size-suv-ranked-from-worst-to-best#1
Heres a new review as well:
https://www.google.com/amp/www.auto...18-ford-expedition-review-and-first-drive/amp
Car and driver ranked all large suvs, mainstream and luxury, except the land cruiser/lx570 ironicallly, ill let you guys form your opinion on it, but i def dont feel or understand what they wrote:
https://www.caranddriver.com/flipbook/big-hauling-every-full-size-suv-ranked-from-worst-to-best#1
Heres a new review as well:
https://www.google.com/amp/www.auto...18-ford-expedition-review-and-first-drive/amp
Yea I wouldn't put the Mercedes at number one, they become money pits and fall apart after a few years nor are they big enough. The most luxurious does not make for the best SUV, do the journalists not know what we use them for, they are supposed to be utilitarian not luxurious. Sequoia was underrated, its a very reliable platform, which is what really matters in this segment. I'd put GMC Yukon/Tahoe at #1 for its combo of features yet utility. I'd put Expedition at #2, Sequoia #3, Armada #4. The luxury ones should get bottom of the line simply due to lack of long term reliability/ high cost to own as well as lack of utility use.