Gary Waugh
Full Access Members
Hi everyone, I own an 08 Ford Expedition, have owned it from new, it has 240+K miles and nearly everything is still original on it. About a year ago (maybe a bit longer), I reset the fuel economy monitor (this car does not have an instant MPG, only an average MPG reading) and carefully drove the car about 30 miles, it averaged 17 MPG. I did this several times over a few months and consistently saw 17MPG.
A year later (now) I did the same thing and I now have a real struggle to get anything better than 13 MPG. There are no check engine lights and when I scan codes with my OBD11 scanner, no errors appear.
I recently wondered if maybe the oxygen sensors were going bad after 18 years and could be causing the higher fuel consumption (the engine does not burn any oil and idles and runs very smoothly).
I just tried the live data app on my OBD11 reader, unfortunately this doesn't show much data for my car, but does allow me to see short and long term fuel trim values. The short term fuel trim value seems to vary from -10% to +10%, from my understanding this sounds very reasonable, after 30+ miles the long term fuel trim shows +2.6%. Can anyone confirm is these values are reasonable and if they would give any indication of a poor oxygen sensor?
Also does anyone have any idea what could change to drop the MPG from 17 to 13? I have cleaned the MAF sensor (using MAF cleaner), I replaced all 8 spark plugs (the old plugs only had 30K miles on them and look great), the air filter was replaced (again the old filter was not very dirty), the engine oil has been replaced every 5K miles with Mobil 1 synthetic, the transmission and differential (+ transfer box) oils have been replaced every 70K miles. I fitted a new Motorcraft fuel filter, but still only see 13 MPG!
The car runs great but I would like to get it back to the earlier 17 MPG if I can, I am running out of ideas on what could be wrong, hence my clutching at the oxygen sensor straw!! If the sensors had failed I would expect an OBD code, but maybe they are getting old/weak and should be replaced? Would a blocked catalytic converters cause a poor MPG without giving an error code (I would expect that if the difference between the O2 sensor before and after the cat was too small/large, then the car would report an error?), However O2 sensors and replacement catalytics are expensive and difficult to access, so I want a bit more proof that they should be changed before I dig into it..
Thanks for and any suggestions.
Gary
A year later (now) I did the same thing and I now have a real struggle to get anything better than 13 MPG. There are no check engine lights and when I scan codes with my OBD11 scanner, no errors appear.
I recently wondered if maybe the oxygen sensors were going bad after 18 years and could be causing the higher fuel consumption (the engine does not burn any oil and idles and runs very smoothly).
I just tried the live data app on my OBD11 reader, unfortunately this doesn't show much data for my car, but does allow me to see short and long term fuel trim values. The short term fuel trim value seems to vary from -10% to +10%, from my understanding this sounds very reasonable, after 30+ miles the long term fuel trim shows +2.6%. Can anyone confirm is these values are reasonable and if they would give any indication of a poor oxygen sensor?
Also does anyone have any idea what could change to drop the MPG from 17 to 13? I have cleaned the MAF sensor (using MAF cleaner), I replaced all 8 spark plugs (the old plugs only had 30K miles on them and look great), the air filter was replaced (again the old filter was not very dirty), the engine oil has been replaced every 5K miles with Mobil 1 synthetic, the transmission and differential (+ transfer box) oils have been replaced every 70K miles. I fitted a new Motorcraft fuel filter, but still only see 13 MPG!
The car runs great but I would like to get it back to the earlier 17 MPG if I can, I am running out of ideas on what could be wrong, hence my clutching at the oxygen sensor straw!! If the sensors had failed I would expect an OBD code, but maybe they are getting old/weak and should be replaced? Would a blocked catalytic converters cause a poor MPG without giving an error code (I would expect that if the difference between the O2 sensor before and after the cat was too small/large, then the car would report an error?), However O2 sensors and replacement catalytics are expensive and difficult to access, so I want a bit more proof that they should be changed before I dig into it..
Thanks for and any suggestions.
Gary