'24 ~1500mi review vs my '19

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

OP
OP
byathread

byathread

Full Access Members
Joined
May 8, 2019
Posts
260
Reaction score
152
Location
Pennsylvania
Fair enough, but the fuel economy of the 3.0 Duramax is hard to beat. Definitely the best engine GM currently offers in the full size SUVs. Again, hope Ford gets their crap together because the Expedition could be really competitive if they put the effort in.
Drove the 3.0. It left me wanting horsepower... Great motor, just prefer the ecoboost/gas motor for my use case (shuttling kids in the burbs/ski trips/waiting in it running to keep warm/cool). I don't like idling a diesel for long periods.
 

Fastcar

Full Access Members
Joined
Dec 14, 2013
Posts
948
Reaction score
583
Location
FL
Fair enough, but the fuel economy of the 3.0 Duramax is hard to beat. Definitely the best engine GM currently offers in the full size SUVs. Again, hope Ford gets their crap together because the Expedition could be really competitive if they put the effort in.
What is the difference in price between the gas and the duramax?
 

Flathead40

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2023
Posts
61
Reaction score
32
Location
Nebraska
Drove the 3.0. It left me wanting horsepower... Great motor, just prefer the ecoboost/gas motor for my use case (shuttling kids in the burbs/ski trips/waiting in it running to keep warm/cool). I don't like idling a diesel for long periods.
Yep I get that and it doesn’t fit everyone’s use case, we have a different use case that involves putting a bunch of miles on every year. We live 20 miles from the nearest Walmart and 60 from the nearest Taco Bell if that puts things in perspective.
 

Flathead40

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2023
Posts
61
Reaction score
32
Location
Nebraska
Looks like a $1000 to $7000 option depending on trim line.
Yeah GMs packages are strange, for instance on the AT4 ticking the Duramax box automatically adds option packages that it doesn’t do on other trims which makes it a lot more expensive option. On a High Country it’s a $600 premium over the 6.2 but on a Premier it’s $5k cheaper than the 6.2. GM things…
 

Fastcar

Full Access Members
Joined
Dec 14, 2013
Posts
948
Reaction score
583
Location
FL
Yeah GMs packages are strange, for instance on the AT4 ticking the Duramax box automatically adds option packages that it doesn’t do on other trims which makes it a lot more expensive option. On a High Country it’s a $600 premium over the 6.2 but on a Premier it’s $5k cheaper than the 6.2. GM things…
Given the initial cost of the engine, the maintenance of it and other operating costs. Is it cost effective?
I remember with the Dodge/Cummins you had to clock over 110K miles to begin to recoup the cost of the engine in fuel savings.
 

Flathead40

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2023
Posts
61
Reaction score
32
Location
Nebraska
Given the initial cost of the engine, the maintenance of it and other operating costs. Is it cost effective?
I remember with the Dodge/Cummins you had to clock over 110K miles to begin to recoup the cost of the engine in fuel savings.
The maintenance cost difference is minor on the 3.0 vs gasser, not like the bigger diesels. Again the actual cost of the engine varies on trim so hard to give a good answer there, but it’s nothing like $12k cost in the heavy duty pickups. Averaging 4-6mpg better so far than the Expedition. So in our use case it works out in our favor, but again it’s not right for everyone. To clarify I love the 3.5 EcoBoost, just not the Expedition that came with it in our case.
 
Top