Ford has a history of ignoring facts. Admittedly, the MPG calculator is a minor annoyance, not even an issue in reality and that is the immediate context for your comment. I am curious, however, how far the laissez faire approach goes.
Would it extend to Ford saying (despite knowing to the contrary) Pinto gas tanks are safe (implied by selling the car with a known safety defect)?
If not that far, how about Ford saying the Fiesta/Focus transmission is reliable - again, despite knowing better?
If not that far, where (to you), between major safety/reliability issues and minor annoyances like MPG computers do facts matter over feelings and what causes the flip in priority? I am truly curious. Being a CPA (i,e., the facts matter crowd), I expect engineers to be able to do something simple like calibrate a flow meter to show accurate MPG. Unlike the Pinto, Fiesta & Focus issues, getting the MPG right has very little incremental cost and could probably be corrected with an automatic flash update downloaded while parked in your garage.
FWIW - I find it amazing that Ford can engineer a big old hulking truck that gets 20+/- MPG and not be able to accurately calibrate a flow meter. Is that a show stopper, no it’s not, not even close.
That would be an interesting discussion I guess. I'm just not very nitpicky about many things in life. Also not about punctuality. I can't stand for anyone to be early. If I tell someone to be at my place at 2:15 and they show up at 2:10 or 2:11 it ****** me off beyond belief. 215 means to 15 or within 10 minutes. I consider anything within 10 minutes after to be on time. I am weird. I always give a 10 minute late grace period But never an early one.
The exception is if you are coming in to relieve someone from a shift at work and you are holding them up but not being there early or on time. I used to have a job where we came in at 5 or on the weekends came in at 2. I expect you to be there walking up and taking over for that person at 2 p.m. sharp so they can leave their post. Even if you are one minute late you're making them wait on you and they want to go home.
It irritates me to no end when managers and companies have a big deal about tardiness when there's multiple people there and there's no rush for employees to be there to do the work. Used to have a morning job where we were there a full hour before the store opened. We were printing up the daily papers for all the customers we had to call hassle about making their payments, a rent-to-own store. More evil than the devil.
We had plenty of downtime there and the managers all sat around and drink coffee and smoke cigarettes anyways. But they act like it was the end of the world if you got there 12 minutes after 9.
I also eventually snarkily told one that they waste the same 12 minutes or more drinking and making coffee but they were getting paid for it. Most companies after 7 minutes will dock you for a full 15 which is totally fine. I only expect to get paid for the time that I'm working and if you only pay in 15 minute increments that makes sense. But when there is no pressing matter for an employee to be there there's no reason for them have to clock in at 9 Sharp. 9:05, 9:07, 9:12 is totally fine in my book.
I have been a manager over a crew of Warehouse employees also. You just have to get to know your managers. You know what they like and don't like. My people knew I had no problem as long as they were there when they were needed. They knew what I wouldn't tolerate and that's theft. When somebody stole something and then we needed it later to fix something or for a customer we were highly inconvenienced. It wasn't about the money or the company. If you're going to steal one make sure they order two. Do not leave me without one in stock when I need it.
In the early days of MPG meters they were vacuum gauges that just showed you when you were using a lot of fuel or less fuel. That would be easy to calibrate and there could simply be a little adjustment screw on the back of the current meters to literally adjust them up or down one mile per gallon. And on the more electronic ones they can incorporate it into the system. I have had a digital thermostat in my house for 15 years that allows you to adjust the temperature it shows because you may not like it showing that temperature or it may actually be inaccurate. So if you are convinced your house is 72° but the thermostat says 73 you can make it say 72 when you think it's 72. This would be just a simple on the in car information center.
Since you brought up the pinto I will have to say my joke that we did for years in the 80s. The Mustang II was just a pinto with the bolt sawed-off.
I hate it when manufacturers don't step up to the plate or go back and fix annoying common problems and failures that can easily be fixed. I know it's about money to them and if they would have started putting a shorter Bolt during the run that would have been admitting there was a problem with the earlier ones so therefore the lawsuit would have come in even quicker and made them more liable.
I just don't have an issue with the mile per gallon meter being up to 2 miles per gallon off. What I do have an issue with is the distance to empty. But those are fine. I haven't had a car yet that would run out as soon as it hits zero. If I fill up my car and it tells me I can go 300 miles, and I go on a trip that I know is 250, I do not want to have to stop and get gas before I get there. And I also want it to tell me I have 8 miles to go and I can get those eight miles without running out of fuel.
And as I stated from beginning if we have to have a 1 mile per gallon discrepancy I would much rather the gauge show 21 miles per gallon as opposed to 20.
It would be nice if the margin of error was 5 mile per gallon or less.
The older I get the more I love the expression... Close enough for government work.
