Tuned Expedition vs. stock Mustang GT

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

scottdm

Full Access Members
Joined
Dec 2, 2018
Posts
828
Reaction score
495
Location
Western PA
This is a fun video with Andre from the Fast Lane Truck. I'm glad 5 Star has a couple of Expeditions in their fleet to help them dial in their tunes. I've been pleased with my 93 tune and it was nice to be able to discuss Expedition specifics with 5 Star at the time that I ordered.

 

16plati

Full Access Members
Joined
Mar 22, 2019
Posts
1,356
Reaction score
453
Location
VA
This one has about 100 extra hp on top your 93 tune. We’ve got another discussion on this in thread titled 650 crank hp
 
OP
OP
scottdm

scottdm

Full Access Members
Joined
Dec 2, 2018
Posts
828
Reaction score
495
Location
Western PA
This one has about 100 extra hp on top your 93 tune. We’ve got another discussion on this in thread titled 650 crank hp

Video was newly posted yesterday, so thought some may enjoy seeing it. Wasn't able to find the other thread you mention.
 

16plati

Full Access Members
Joined
Mar 22, 2019
Posts
1,356
Reaction score
453
Location
VA
Video was newly posted yesterday, so thought some may enjoy seeing it. Wasn't able to find the other thread you mention.
Ah gotcha. How unliking ur 93 perf? Got any revisions done yet?
 
OP
OP
scottdm

scottdm

Full Access Members
Joined
Dec 2, 2018
Posts
828
Reaction score
495
Location
Western PA
I've been primarily using the 93 towing/daily driving tune and I've been pleased with the results. I like that the various driving modes (eco, sport, normal, etc) still offer distinct attributes within the tune that is being run. Overall, the throttle response and shifting behaviors are more responsive, which is a noticeable improvement. I did add the JLT catch can, but that is all so far. I may do a cold air intake at some point, but am pleased with the current performance, so we'll see.
 

16plati

Full Access Members
Joined
Mar 22, 2019
Posts
1,356
Reaction score
453
Location
VA
I've been primarily using the 93 towing/daily driving tune and I've been pleased with the results. I like that the various driving modes (eco, sport, normal, etc) still offer distinct attributes within the tune that is being run. Overall, the throttle response and shifting behaviors are more responsive, which is a noticeable improvement. I did add the JLT catch can, but that is all so far. I may do a cold air intake at some point, but am pleased with the current performance, so we'll see.
If you do the intake, make sure you datalog or it will be for nothing
 

Grey ghost

Full Access Members
Joined
Apr 26, 2019
Posts
360
Reaction score
134
Location
Melbourne fl
I just used sport mode for the first time since I tuned it. I didn't think it would make much difference, but as Ron white said" and I was wrong". Had guy in a hemi ram thought he was a hot dog the expedition barked the tires shifting and showed him taillights really quick.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
scottdm

scottdm

Full Access Members
Joined
Dec 2, 2018
Posts
828
Reaction score
495
Location
Western PA
I just used sport mode for the first time since I tuned it. I didn't think it would make much difference, but as Ron white said" and I was wrong". Had guy in a hemi ram thought he was a hot dog the expedition barked the tires shifting and showed him taillights really quick.

Nice! Are you running the 93 towing/daily driving tune, or the 93 performance tune? I've noticed I have to disable traction control for any spirited driving since it intervenes way too early.
 

rjdelp7

2000 XLT
Joined
Nov 30, 2014
Posts
1,529
Reaction score
378
Location
NY
Video is bull$hit. Expedition has a new intake, intercooler and 'high flow' cats, E50 fuel. Lets see a stock Expedition(with a tune only on pump gas), vs. a stock Mustang. The power to weight ratio alone says this doesn't make sense. 2,000lbs more, come on? Can someone from Ford weigh in?
 

JExpedition07

That One Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Posts
6,530
Reaction score
3,140
Location
New York
Video is bull$hit. Expedition has a new intake, intercooler and 'high flow' cats, E50 fuel. Lets see a stock Expedition(with a tune only on pump gas), vs. a stock Mustang. The power to weight ratio alone says this doesn't make sense. 2,000lbs more, come on? Can someone from Ford weigh in?

They said Stock Mustang GT vs modified Expedition it was a fair title. Yes an ethanol tuned or modified 5.0 would have left the Expedition back but key word is Stock. The Expedition still only beat the GT by about 5 feet with all the work done, and in the 1/4 mile the stock GT would have won looking at how it starts running the Expedition down toward the end. They don’t want to show their modified press truck getting spanked by a stock car, hence the short run.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
scottdm

scottdm

Full Access Members
Joined
Dec 2, 2018
Posts
828
Reaction score
495
Location
Western PA
Obviously lots of factors at play, but just for fun to show off their ecoboost mods.
 

Grey ghost

Full Access Members
Joined
Apr 26, 2019
Posts
360
Reaction score
134
Location
Melbourne fl
93 performance tune , I also have the daily and towing tune but 5 star said run the performance tune.
All the modifications were listed.what would Ford know about the tunes
 

16plati

Full Access Members
Joined
Mar 22, 2019
Posts
1,356
Reaction score
453
Location
VA
Video is bull$hit. Expedition has a new intake, intercooler and 'high flow' cats, E50 fuel. Lets see a stock Expedition(with a tune only on pump gas), vs. a stock Mustang. The power to weight ratio alone says this doesn't make sense. 2,000lbs more, come on? Can someone from Ford weigh in?
We’ve already established this in a previous thread, clown. A win is a win
 

16plati

Full Access Members
Joined
Mar 22, 2019
Posts
1,356
Reaction score
453
Location
VA
93 performance tune , I also have the daily and towing tune but 5 star said run the performance tune.
All the modifications were listed.what would Ford know about the tunes
He’s just being himself, gotta ask ford since he knows nothing about ecoboosts as he’s never owned one
 

edizzle

Full Access Members
Joined
Dec 25, 2017
Posts
973
Reaction score
473
Location
Cashiers
Video is bull$hit. Expedition has a new intake, intercooler and 'high flow' cats, E50 fuel. Lets see a stock Expedition(with a tune only on pump gas), vs. a stock Mustang. The power to weight ratio alone says this doesn't make sense. 2,000lbs more, come on? Can someone from Ford weigh in?
dude you need to take a reading comprehension course!!!
 

rjdelp7

2000 XLT
Joined
Nov 30, 2014
Posts
1,529
Reaction score
378
Location
NY
dude you need to take a reading comprehension course!!!
That 'video' was about as real as Dirty Harry. It probably had $4K in work done, to equal an 1/8 mile speed of 90mph. I will run my 2011 Mustang Gt against any 'new', stock Expedition. You guys are dreamers. I drove a V6 Expedition, its peppy maybe, not race fast. Not even close. Drive a 5.0l Mustang and report back.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
57,017
Posts
535,900
Members
54,714
Latest member
Budman55
Top