'18 Expedition Brake Torque Spec Confirmation

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

KOMaynard

Active Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2025
Posts
29
Reaction score
17
Location
Central NY
I'm prepping for a Pads/Rotors on my '18 Expedition Max, in addition to the all too common driver side valve cover. In preparation for the valve cover, I got a subscription for AllData, and decided to do check the Torque Specs for the Brakes.

That being said, it's listing the following specs, which sound like they have to be incorrect and are too high, but perhaps they aren't. Anyone able to confirm if the following listing is factual, and if so, if anyone has actually tried to follow this spec with success?

FRONT Caliper Bolts: 27 ft-lb
FRONT Caliper Bracket Bolts: 184 ft-lb
REAR Caliper Bolts: 26 ft-lb
REAR Caliper Bracket Bolts: 258 ft-lb

Thanks in advance.
 

S20Workstation4

Full Access Members
Joined
Dec 22, 2022
Posts
201
Reaction score
115
Location
Hyde Park, NY
Yes, those specs are correct.

The Rear Bracket seems abnormally high, but I checked with the workshop manual it is indeed 258 Ft-lbs.


Joseph
 
OP
OP
K

KOMaynard

Active Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2025
Posts
29
Reaction score
17
Location
Central NY
Yes, those specs are correct.

The Rear Bracket seems abnormally high, but I checked with the workshop manual it is indeed 258 Ft-lbs.


Joseph
Yeah, that was my exact thought as well. 258 is a whole lot of force, and well above anything I've ever run into before. I was almost wondering if it was misprinted as ft-lb instead of NM. The most I've seen on rears is like 140.
 
OP
OP
K

KOMaynard

Active Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2025
Posts
29
Reaction score
17
Location
Central NY
Looking at the actual listings for parts, although the procedure calls for removal of the bracket. It looks like it isn't necessary to even remove the rear bracket, even if you're doing a rotor change. I may be able to avoid the entire thing all together, it'll just make cleaning the slide pin guide holes a little more tedious. I wonder if the design being the way it is, causes the need for the uptick in torque.

The front looks like it'll have to happen either way. It has a more traditional design and blocks the rotor from being removed.
 

Avian

Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2025
Posts
11
Reaction score
7
Location
Houston, Texas
I'm prepping for a Pads/Rotors on my '18 Expedition Max, in addition to the all too common driver side valve cover. In preparation for the valve cover, I got a subscription for AllData, and decided to do check the Torque Specs for the Brakes.

That being said, it's listing the following specs, which sound like they have to be incorrect and are too high, but perhaps they aren't. Anyone able to confirm if the following listing is factual, and if so, if anyone has actually tried to follow this spec with success?

FRONT Caliper Bolts: 27 ft-lb
FRONT Caliper Bracket Bolts: 184 ft-lb
REAR Caliper Bolts: 26 ft-lb
REAR Caliper Bracket Bolts: 258 ft-lb

Thanks in advance.
Having lived through the horror of doing a brake job (professionally) and not torqueing those crucial bolts to specs and having the caliper fall off inside the wheel and destroy the wheel, caliper, and other goodies, I not only torque to spec, but the caliper bracket mounting bolts (which were what failed in my case 20+ years ago), I apply Loc-tite red as well.

I've done hundreds of brake jobs since, applied the thread locker, and had NO failures since!

Final note: The failure I had was on a GMC Suburban loaded with kids. Thankfully, there were no injuries or any type of accident.
 

Tom991

Member
Army
Joined
Jan 16, 2025
Posts
19
Reaction score
9
Location
Vero Beach, FL
I'm prepping for a Pads/Rotors on my '18 Expedition Max, in addition to the all too common driver side valve cover. In preparation for the valve cover, I got a subscription for AllData, and decided to do check the Torque Specs for the Brakes.

That being said, it's listing the following specs, which sound like they have to be incorrect and are too high, but perhaps they aren't. Anyone able to confirm if the following listing is factual, and if so, if anyone has actually tried to follow this spec with success?

FRONT Caliper Bolts: 27 ft-lb
FRONT Caliper Bracket Bolts: 184 ft-lb
REAR Caliper Bolts: 26 ft-lb
REAR Caliper Bracket Bolts: 258 ft-lb

Thanks in advance.
When I did my rears I read that the rear brackets were 154 ft lbs. I used my old torque wrench to see how much the were torqued to. They started to turn at 155 lbs.
 

ROBERT BONNER

Full Access Members
Joined
Apr 2, 2021
Posts
296
Reaction score
334
Location
Denver, NC
It's been a while since I did the rears on my '20; but, my recollection is that they are an "open" caliper bracket design. Meaning that the rear (only) caliper bracket does not have to be removed to remove the rotor; so, you don't have to disturb those 258 ft lb ers. Note that someone went a little torque crazy in the rear of these trucks. As I recall the rear lower strut mount is a (legendary) 406 ft lbs.
 

HILLY

Full Access Members
Joined
May 12, 2023
Posts
320
Reaction score
235
Location
Greenville, SC
Some insane torque specs indeed on this truck. Those bolts are 258 lb.ft. (350 Nm). This is the upper limit of 1/2" drive torque wrenches as most top out at 250 lb.ft. or 350 Nm as spec'd. Also, the FSM also states that the bolts, and all other brake related bolts, are one time use (likely because of Loctite, which can be reapplied. They aren't TTY bolts). The caliper to anchor plate are spec'd at 26 lb.ft. (35 Nm).

1773761168274.png

It would make things easier and skip a step if the anchor plate plate has enough clearance to maneuver the disc off the hub as Robert states.

Make sure you also follow the EPB Service mode procedure before removing the rear caliper.

1773763195229.png
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
K

KOMaynard

Active Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2025
Posts
29
Reaction score
17
Location
Central NY
I appreciate the help. Taking on the front today, limited time and not ideal conditions, but I was onto metal on the driver side at the piston side.
 
Last edited:
Top