Aftermarket? What aftermarket.

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

5280tunage

Full Access Members
Joined
Sep 17, 2019
Posts
1,875
Reaction score
1,154
Location
colorado
I second what @Going_Going_Gone says about brakes. When upgrading the engine and suspension for a race bike, we always upgrade the brakes as well. Believe it or not, brakes are just as important for going fast in racing as power. The better your brakes, the more you can use the power.
I don't disagree with upgrading brakes, but good tires with the right compound can make just as much of a difference for stopping than upgraded brakes. I've upgraded brakes and even done big brakes on other vehicles I've owned, but honestly at 23k miles, I've had very few issues with brake fade and so far (knock on wood) no warping. And I drive mountain passes a lot and tend to go a little fast. I do use the gears a lot descending passes though. I have plenty of power upgrades and have started shredding my rears but again the brakes are pretty decent for stock.

Once it's time for brakes, I will probably do some good powerstops or something, but I can tell you that with the upgrades and the tunes, this thing is nuts. Just wish it wasn't so loud :)
 
OP
OP
S

stimul8

Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2021
Posts
23
Reaction score
7
Location
California
The newer Expy should be faster by a good bit. Any 2021+ F-150 with the 5.0 V8 or 3.5 Eco will smoke a 4th gen Expedition (they are all in the mid 5’s to 60 now with 400 horse and a lot less weight with either engine). But a 2012 doesn’t have a shot. I think it’s just a quieter vehicle and may not feel as fast.

Just so you know by the specs the only engine you could get in 2012 that will match your 2019 Expedition is the 6.2L V8 with 411 horsepower….a very rare truck. But those hit 6.2 seconds in Harley Davidson and Limited trim like your Expys time. The Raptors were slower so they don’t even count. An older 5.0? Nah.
The newer Expy should be faster by a good bit. Any 2021+ F-150 with the 5.0 V8 or 3.5 Eco will smoke a 4th gen Expedition (they are all in the mid 5’s to 60 now with 400 horse and a lot less weight with either engine). But a 2012 doesn’t have a shot. I think it’s just a quieter vehicle and may not feel as fast.

Just so you know by the specs the only engine you could get in 2012 that will match your 2019 Expedition is the 6.2L V8 with 411 horsepower….a very rare truck. But those hit 6.2 seconds in Harley Davidson and Limited trim like your Expys time. The Raptors were slower so they don’t even count. An older 5.0? Nah.
Well, I’m not just comparing power... I’m looking at overall driving experience, reliability, replacement part availability, etc. You’re correct in that the 5.0 won’t beat the 3.5 TT, but it also doesn’t work as hard for the power it has. Call me old-fashioned... I’m partial to naturally-aspirated engines because of this. When it comes to average mpg, I’m not really gaining much with the 3.5 either. I’m not too heavy on the foot, but only getting 16mpg combined. And with the 5.0 I can tow more, carry more payload, and do better off-roading.

I know, I know. I’m kind of comparing apples to oranges. I think I just really appreciated the 5.0 in it’s high capability, yet simplicity. With the Expo I get a ton of bells and whistles, but that’s basically all electronics. All the non-electronic features are somewhat bit tuned down lower than expected from an F-150.

Btw, is there a decent aftermarket blow-off valve for these suckers? That’s about as close as I’m getting to being blown these days.
 
OP
OP
S

stimul8

Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2021
Posts
23
Reaction score
7
Location
California
And I guess a decent thing with this Expo is I can load an 8ft piece of lumber in the back without having it hang over the top of a tailgate. But now I’m too shy to load lumber, cause I don’t want to screw up the interior.

Quick! Someone find my testicles!
 

duneslider

Full Access Members
Joined
Mar 20, 2019
Posts
902
Reaction score
438
Location
Utah
So why exactly did you buy an expedition and not a truck? It sure seems like you want a truck and not an SUV?
 

LokiWolf

Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2016
Posts
3,971
Reaction score
2,837
Location
Richmond VA
People keep complaining about the MPG in the Expedition vs 150....Well DUH. It weighs more. To the person who moved from a 2018 with the 2.7 with very few options based on the Steering wheel to an Expeditions. You are probably looking at 600-800 lbs difference in weight. Weight is one of the largest factors in fuel usage. 150's option for option are going to be lighter.

Well, I’m not just comparing power... I’m looking at overall driving experience, reliability, replacement part availability, etc. You’re correct in that the 5.0 won’t beat the 3.5 TT, but it also doesn’t work as hard for the power it has. Call me old-fashioned... I’m partial to naturally-aspirated engines because of this. When it comes to average mpg, I’m not really gaining much with the 3.5 either. I’m not too heavy on the foot, but only getting 16mpg combined. And with the 5.0 I can tow more, carry more payload, and do better off-roading.

I know, I know. I’m kind of comparing apples to oranges. I think I just really appreciated the 5.0 in it’s high capability, yet simplicity. With the Expo I get a ton of bells and whistles, but that’s basically all electronics. All the non-electronic features are somewhat bit tuned down lower than expected from an F-150.

Btw, is there a decent aftermarket blow-off valve for these suckers? That’s about as close as I’m getting to being blown these days.

How is a 5.0 better off road than a 3.5? Why does Ford put the 3.5 in the Raptor, and now the 2021 Tremor? 3.5 is affected less by altitude, and has FAR more torque down low where it is needed when off-roading.

You are touting the 5.0, yet want to put a blow off valve on, so you can hear that you are turbo charged even more...especially when it is a part that has ZERO performance gain on this platform. So confused. Your vehicle.

Bottom line, is there is plenty that can be done to these, just look around. Is it going to have as much aftermarket support as a 150, NOPE, because it doesn't sell as many. Supply and Demand.
 

Fozzy

Full Access Members
Joined
Sep 5, 2019
Posts
1,199
Reaction score
1,161
Location
Riverton
People keep complaining about the MPG in the Expedition vs 150....Well DUH. It weighs more. To the person who moved from a 2018 with the 2.7 with very few options based on the Steering wheel to an Expeditions. You are probably looking at 600-800 lbs difference in weight. Weight is one of the largest factors in fuel usage. 150's option for option are going to be lighter.



How is a 5.0 better off road than a 3.5? Why does Ford put the 3.5 in the Raptor, and now the 2021 Tremor? 3.5 is affected less by altitude, and has FAR more torque down low where it is needed when off-roading.

You are touting the 5.0, yet want to put a blow off valve on, so you can hear that you are turbo charged even more...especially when it is a part that has ZERO performance gain on this platform. So confused. Your vehicle.

Bottom line, is there is plenty that can be done to these, just look around. Is it going to have as much aftermarket support as a 150, NOPE, because it doesn't sell as many. Supply and Demand.
5.0 = Five Point Slow.
N/A = Only at Sea Level.
Also rumors of the 3.5 in the Bronco Warthog. That would be sick!
Nice to see you logged in today.
 

LokiWolf

Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2016
Posts
3,971
Reaction score
2,837
Location
Richmond VA
5.0 = Five Point Slow.
N/A = Only at Sea Level.
Also rumors of the 3.5 in the Bronco Warthog. That would be sick!
Nice to see you logged in today.
100% Anybody who thinks the 5.0 is better at moving weight down the road than the 3.5 has spent very little time with the motor. Or thinks sound moves vehicles. I am like most people, and LOVE the sound of the 5.0, but I want it to move when I press the go pedal...and the 3.5's torque, moves this heavy thing down the road.

I think you are going to see the 3.0 possibly the new 2nd Gen 3.0 in the Warthog. The 3.0 is going to be in the Ranger Raptor, and many are hoping it will be a 2nd Gen with both Port and Direct injection. The 3.0 is a beast!!! On E50 it gets my Explorer to 60 in 3.7...tune and E50 only.
 

lbv150

Full Access Members
Joined
Mar 12, 2011
Posts
606
Reaction score
284
Location
Northeast
The only 5.0 I like is in my 1985 Mustang GT and it's far from stock.
 

JExpedition07

That One Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Posts
6,530
Reaction score
3,140
Location
New York
The only 5.0 I like is in my 1985 Mustang GT and it's far from stock.
A new GT 5.0 has 460 stock horsepower. There’s a reason so many guys hate on them…it’s because they are always looking at the taillights when they try to run them haha. A simple E-85 tune puts you at 500 crank horsepower with well into the 400’s at the wheels. Direct injection is wonderful, in 1985 you’d have to rebuild and throw a blower on that pushrod 5.0 to do what a simple flash tune can do on a 2021 overhead cam 5.0.
 
Last edited:

JExpedition07

That One Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Posts
6,530
Reaction score
3,140
Location
New York
Well, I’m not just comparing power... I’m looking at overall driving experience, reliability, replacement part availability, etc. You’re correct in that the 5.0 won’t beat the 3.5 TT, but it also doesn’t work as hard for the power it has. Call me old-fashioned... I’m partial to naturally-aspirated engines because of this. When it comes to average mpg, I’m not really gaining much with the 3.5 either. I’m not too heavy on the foot, but only getting 16mpg combined. And with the 5.0 I can tow more, carry more payload, and do better off-roading.

I know, I know. I’m kind of comparing apples to oranges. I think I just really appreciated the 5.0 in it’s high capability, yet simplicity. With the Expo I get a ton of bells and whistles, but that’s basically all electronics. All the non-electronic features are somewhat bit tuned down lower than expected from an F-150.

Btw, is there a decent aftermarket blow-off valve for these suckers? That’s about as close as I’m getting to being blown these days.

The 3.5 isn’t working hard to get its power that’s what’s great about it, all the torque comes in low in the rev range the way these turbos are set up
 

Fozzy

Full Access Members
Joined
Sep 5, 2019
Posts
1,199
Reaction score
1,161
Location
Riverton
A new GT 5.0 has 460 stock horsepower. There’s a reason so many guys hate on them…it’s because they are always looking at the taillights when they try to run them haha. A simple E-85 tune puts you at 500 crank horsepower with well into the 400’s at the wheels. Direct injection is wonderful, in 1985 you’d have to rebuild and throw a blower on that pushrod 5.0 to do what a simple flash tune can do on a 2021 overhead cam 5.0.
But it's only 0.9 seconds faster 0-60 than the little EcoBoost. Not the 3.5, and if I remember right they also put the 3.5 in their supercar not the 5.slow.
 

Boostedbus

Full Access Members
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Posts
747
Reaction score
465
Location
Maryland
The 3.5 isn’t working hard to get its power that’s what’s great about it, all the torque comes in low in the rev range the way these turbos are set up
This is probably the biggest misconception people have about the 3.5 Ecoboost. People just assume because it’s a little V6 it must have to be wound up tight to make power. The opposite is actually true thanks to the turbos making max torque in the engine around 2500 rpm. When I’m on the highway running 80 mph with my 3.73 rear gears in my 2017, it’s turning 2300 rpm’s in 6th gear. I’m right in the power band wheelhouse. It doesn’t have to search for a lower gear when it hits a hill because it’s already giving me its best and doesn’t need to peg the tach to get there.
 

JExpedition07

That One Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Posts
6,530
Reaction score
3,140
Location
New York
But it's only 0.9 seconds faster 0-60 than the little EcoBoost. Not the 3.5, and if I remember right they also put the 3.5 in their supercar not the 5.slow.
The 5.2 Predator going in the 2023 Raptor R is based heavily on 5.0 architecture and has 760 horsepower, same engine that is shoehorned into the GT-500 currently…1 second difference to 60 is quite significant, and the gap only widens in the upper revs and gears. Agreed the GT was a work of art, and done on the common 3.5 Eco architecture we all know from production vehicles which is crazy cool.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
S

stimul8

Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2021
Posts
23
Reaction score
7
Location
California
People keep complaining about the MPG in the Expedition vs 150....Well DUH. It weighs more. To the person who moved from a 2018 with the 2.7 with very few options based on the Steering wheel to an Expeditions. You are probably looking at 600-800 lbs difference in weight. Weight is one of the largest factors in fuel usage. 150's option for option are going to be lighter.



How is a 5.0 better off road than a 3.5? Why does Ford put the 3.5 in the Raptor, and now the 2021 Tremor? 3.5 is affected less by altitude, and has FAR more torque down low where it is needed when off-roading.

You are touting the 5.0, yet want to put a blow off valve on, so you can hear that you are turbo charged even more...especially when it is a part that has ZERO performance gain on this platform. So confused. Your vehicle.

Bottom line, is there is plenty that can be done to these, just look around. Is it going to have as much aftermarket support as a 150, NOPE, because it doesn't sell as many. Supply and Demand.
I'm not complaining about the mpg, though. Just mentioned what I normally get compared to an F150. With large vehicles, low mpg just comes with the territory. My knowledge in the area might lack some depth, but any wonder why they don't make the EcoBoosts FlexFuel also?
 
OP
OP
S

stimul8

Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2021
Posts
23
Reaction score
7
Location
California
People keep complaining about the MPG in the Expedition vs 150....Well DUH. It weighs more. To the person who moved from a 2018 with the 2.7 with very few options based on the Steering wheel to an Expeditions. You are probably looking at 600-800 lbs difference in weight. Weight is one of the largest factors in fuel usage. 150's option for option are going to be lighter.



How is a 5.0 better off road than a 3.5? Why does Ford put the 3.5 in the Raptor, and now the 2021 Tremor? 3.5 is affected less by altitude, and has FAR more torque down low where it is needed when off-roading.

You are touting the 5.0, yet want to put a blow off valve on, so you can hear that you are turbo charged even more...especially when it is a part that has ZERO performance gain on this platform. So confused. Your vehicle.

Bottom line, is there is plenty that can be done to these, just look around. Is it going to have as much aftermarket support as a 150, NOPE, because it doesn't sell as many. Supply and Demand.
What I'm doing is trying to make the vehicle feel more like mine while I'm driving it. I had the F150 for 9 years, so there's definitely going to be some sentiment. I had some BFG KO2s on the truck, so I'm likely to get those for this car too. No performance gain per se (maybe better snow performance), but the previous set I had served me well. Also, when comparing the F150 to the Expo, I never said a 5.0 was "better"... just more appreciated in terms of known long term reliability, build quality, etc. The performance comparisons I made were in regards to suspension, and how the big guy is a but tuned down. No, you shouldn't expect to be hauling tons of lumber or a huge trailer with it, but it would've been nice to preserve more of its truck roots and would just add to its versatility.

It just seems to me that all the added features raising the price are in the electronics department and are more "nice-to-have". For a $45k F-150, even with less raw power than a 3.5, it got me out of and through pretty much any road condition. I have yet to test the Expo on that, but I am hearing stories already of the differential overheating and temporary disabling itself.
 

LokiWolf

Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2016
Posts
3,971
Reaction score
2,837
Location
Richmond VA
The Expedition has the highest towing capacity of anything in its class. Not only that, but it does it with ease. I have only towed over 8K with it twice, but it handled it VERY easily. I have towed 5-6K MANY times, through the East Coast mountains(Not even close to the west, but still can push a lessor vehicle), with ZERO issue. Heck with the towing package it can pull more than some of the competitors 1500 Trucks. So it has PLENTY of it's truck roots. There are plenty on here who loads theirs down regularly.

I have found the Expedition to be better in the snow, and adverse conditions, because of better weight distribution, and more weight over the rear than any of my previous 250's or 150's.

"Flex fuel"(By the way, I hate this term) is a partially complicated conversation. From the factory, it is WAY easier to make a NA motor Flex Fuel capable because the power variance, and fuel delivery variance are smaller. The capability and demand for Fuel delivery when going to full E85, on a Turbo motor is a whole other story. The Pump has to have a MUCH higher flow rate, than would EVER be needed with even E30. With proper tuning, the stock pump can handle full E85, but it is "turned down" a bit. It is faster than a 93 tune, especially as heat becomes a factor, but slower than E50. From a performance standpoint, our 2020 Limited Expedition Max is stock other than tuning. ZFG 93 Tune is good for a 5.04 second run to 60, and the E85 tune is good for 4.72 second run to 60. We have never tuned it to E50, because the wife doesn't want to mix. I run E85 most of the Summer, and 93 in the winter. Hope that clarifies a bit.
 

shinysideup2

Full Access Members
Joined
Jun 4, 2018
Posts
125
Reaction score
52
Location
Monrovia, CA
Have you found the Rancho and 6112’s for the 4th gen expeditions?
 
Top