Huh? reputable among audiophiles? While there is a lot of controversy among audiophiles what is good, real, natural, true, realistic, sweet etc sound reproduction, I think one thing 99% of them share and that B&O looks good (not even in my opinion) and sounds really bad and is totally overpriced. Function follows form in their case...Of course a $10k B&O eclipses a $300 boom box but same system would be teared down by a carefully selected $1-3k system...but then again, people want convenience and "good" looks and don't know what a good system sounds like and hence fall for B&O.
Personally, I heard $500k systems which were not intriguing (not B&O) and I heard a $40k system (refurbished old tube amps with a Quad electrostat) which was absolutely top and was better than many systems two or four times its price....personally, btw, I have a 18w transistor amp with a single chassis horn with supravox chassis. Does not provide earth shattering base, but a clean mid and crips very fast, but not aggressive treble. Btw: my significant other hates the looks...lol...but for looks I buy a picture...haha). To each its own, but B&O is NOT a high-end audiophile system. Period. B&W may be.....;-)
PS: Having to do some research after my rand...and some audiophiles indeed like the Beolab 90 system for $85k (including amp and dac)....
http://www.tonmeister.ca/wordpress/2016/01/09/beolab-90-at-ces-2016/
to each its own....