boost is a wonderful thing.
i moved over from naturally aspirated several moons ago... it just can't be beaten with today's computer controlled applications that can alter timing curve, fuel trim, and even valve events quicker than you can possibly monitor them...
one of the things you hear non-stop from the n/a crowd is "there is no replacement for displacement".... and i was just like them... but, yeah- there is. boost... figure it like this: a full atmosphere of boost (14.7#'s or 1 full bar at sea level) doubles (in theory) the air through the engine (and burns correlating amount of fuel while doing so)... on a 3.5L engine, that is equiv to a 7.0L engine, depending on the VE... so- to the "replacement/displacement" crowd, I say: "there is your displacement"....
on the flip side, you don't always need that measure of power- a matter of fact, you don't need it that often at all... which means that 3.5L engine is drawing 3.5L per cycle (if VE is 100%) and only using the fuel for it..... if stioch (14.7:1 air:fuel) that HALF the fuel consumption of a perfectly trimmed 7.0 (also 100% VE) uses ALL THE TIME.
Q: how can displacement be better in that case? .... A: because the torque curve is what it is and power is on demand, it really can't be...
that said....... i hear rumblings of a 5.0TT inbound, presumably based on the coyote platform?..... oh boy... that causes me ears to perk.
I was going to add a s/c to a newly built 5.4 SOHC 2v up until two weeks ago- and drop it into a 2000 EB I picked up... but I decided the kid would be better off in the EB and I'm selling her jeep, now... she'll be able to run that thing through college, which makes better economic sense.