Yup. There are solutions to everything, but just like the original design, they have compromises. The rear axle has an upper and lower trailing link, and as they swing down (suspension droops), the axle assembly moves forward, and as the swing up (suspension compression) the Axle moves rearward. For this not to happen, and the axle to stay in the same place front to rear would require these links to vary in length throughout the suspension travel, not very practical.
You could compensate for the static position after lift by fitting longer trailing arms, but as AllBoostNoEco mentions, then you run the risk of the tire contacting the rear of the wheel opening or other hard parts on severe compression. Of course, when you use a spacer lift like are most commonly available, your fully compressed position is two inches lower than it was from the factory. Without working numbers its impossible to tell, but I’d venture a guess that you could run longer and/or adjustable length arms to center the wheel at static load, and *probably* not run into interference on compression, since Compression is reduced anyway.
So why don’t longer arms exist? Maybe my ‘back of a napkin’/’in my head’ calculations are wrong, and there become interference issues.. Maybe there is just not deemed enough of a market for it to be profitable? I dunno, you decide..