"Thunder" 1998 Expedition Build Thread .... fixed pics!!

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

OP
OP
MISTERgadget

MISTERgadget

Full Access Members
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Posts
227
Reaction score
201
Location
Miami
Engine is out, next is the transmission's turn!

IMG_2310.jpg

But as the procrastinator I am, the rest of the engine bay was emptied out and degreased first

IMG_2406.jpg

Not many pictures or details as wrestling these things out solo is not for the faint of heart. Just the height I needed to get to clear the trans and trans jack was nerve-wracking.

IMG_2478.jpg

The perspective in the picture doesn't quite show just how high up it needs to be. It's definitely a butt pucker moment.

IMG_2479.jpg

Now that the transmission was out, was when I hit the main hurdle that would really change the whole trajectory of the project. A little bit of "this'll work better" and "might as well while you're there" thrown in, and it was all downhill from there.

What happened? Well, I had assumed.... and we know what assumptions are the mother of....

IMG_2470.jpg

On the left, painted in black, is a used built transmission out of a totaled Lightning I had gotten a deal on a few years ago. It sat patiently in the corner waiting for it's time to shine again. On the right, the transmission out of my Expedition. Looking carefully we can tell one of this things is not like the other.... there's a sensor in the middle of the case on the black one, and the tailshaft housing and sensor are pretty different on the silver one out of my Expedition....

Yeah, definitely not the same stuff here....

IMG_2473.jpg

IMG_2475.jpg

So, what was I looking at? I have to confess I hadn't really done the research and my expertise was on the Lightning stuff more than the changes between 97-98 and 99+... I had an E4OD in my Expedition, not a 4R100. And unless I wanted to spend big bucks getting the E4OD built to the same spec I had in this built 4R100... finding a way to run that 4R100 would be the most economical option.

The 4R100 has an OSS sensor - output shaft speed. The sensor reads directly from the output shaft and then that signal gets translated by the ECU and other boxes to be whatever it needs to be.

E4OD has a VSS - Vehicle Speed Sensor. There's a mechanical output from the tailshaft housing, turning a gear that can be changed to adjust the speedo, etc... and then that gear is read by a sensor that is in turn intrepreted by the PCM etc.. as Vehicle Speed.

Plan A: The first path I went down in researching alternatives was keeping everything else in place, but adapting the 4R100 in... "ok, what does the ECU need to see from the 4R100 to run it" and "can the E4OD PCM run the 4R100".

The first part wasn't too bad. There's a few different boxes that can convert the OSS signal to VSS, just need to work out things like the pulses per revolution that each sensor creates and what the ECU is expecting.

On the second part, the answer was also yes, but not quite the resounding yes that I wanted. Put an E4OD solenoid pack and VB in, and just ignore the input shaft speed signal as the ECU can't read it anyway. You'll lose PWM TCC lockup as the earlier ECU can't do it. So it'll work, but anytime you're losing sensors or unable to have certain features work as intended, that type of thing bugs me. The outcome works, practically speaking, but you lose things that engineers had to justify the cost of including... so clearly there is some benefit to it. That on it's own wasn't what really swayed me though. The issue comes in when you compare it to the pros of the second alternative I was considering.

If it isn't clear by now, I am a major major Lightning junkie and have owned one since 2003. I am also someone who likes collecting parts here and there I think might be useful... so I had a varity of bits and pieces from totaled or parted out Lightnings that I had collected thinking "hmm maybe one day I can use that". This is where Option B was brainstormed.

Plan B: The other option to run a 4R100, is just to put in a computer that will run a 4R100..... which sounds simple, but the electronics and wiring completely changed from 98 to 99, and everything was different... well, being a parts hoarder, I assumed I had nearly everything. I had an engine harness, engine bay harness/fusebox, and transmission harness out of a 99 Lightning, and a computer and instrument cluster out of a 2003 Lightning. I knew the dash harness in my 98 would be the sticking point, but figured that I could use all the Lightning stuff with a 99+ Expedition dash harness, and then the engine bay harness would plug in on the other side, maybe with some minor tweaks, and everything would be hunky dory. I've got most of what I would need to convert it in my hands, and a junkyard trip to get some harnesses and a dash fusebox would likely put me out of pocket the same or less than a speedo calibration adapter and a handful of transmission parts.

What sealed the decision in favor of Plan B? Well, the 03 Lightning ECU has a faster processor and tables that don't exist in 97-98 calibrations, specific for supercharging, and is much more of a known quantity for custom tuning. Plus you get an extra IAT and barometer sensor the NA trucks don't have. The 97-98 ECUs are slower, and not as tuning friendly, and the Expedition calibrations in particular are files that aren't very popular for tuning and not as well developed. Calling around a couple tuners, they all resoundingly preferred tuning a newer Lightning ECU, especially for built motor with a whipple.

Icing on the cake? I would get to use my Lightning instrument cluster! What could make a Thunder tribute build more authentic and true to Ford's concept than that?

So, off I went to do my homework....
 

rjdelp7

2000 XLT
Joined
Nov 30, 2014
Posts
1,530
Reaction score
375
Location
NY
There should be two speed sensors one near the front and one rear. Might be able to swap them.
 

rjdelp7

2000 XLT
Joined
Nov 30, 2014
Posts
1,530
Reaction score
375
Location
NY
The 4x4s don't have coil springs, they have torsion bars.
 
OP
OP
MISTERgadget

MISTERgadget

Full Access Members
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Posts
227
Reaction score
201
Location
Miami
There should be two speed sensors one near the front and one rear. Might be able to swap them.

Yeah the 4R100 has two. The E4OD only has the rear one.

If you mean the other speed sensor in the rear axle. That one is a different animal, it’s for the ABS.

The 4x4s don't have coil springs, they have torsion bars.

Correct. Do you bring this up because of the discussion regarding the UCAs?
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
MISTERgadget

MISTERgadget

Full Access Members
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Posts
227
Reaction score
201
Location
Miami
While brainstorming on the trans dilemma continued, I kept at the rest of it. Engine bay was now empty and mostly bare, but I wanted it to really look good.

IMG_2578.jpg

So everything that could be disassembled or taken out of the way, was. Only the AC was left intact so it could be evacuated properly.

IMG_2630.jpg

Got these handy dollies from Amazon and I was very impressed with how easy they made it to get this thing turned around, even by myself. Time to go for a little trip

IMG_2634.jpg

Pushed her out into the street and loaded it on the trailer!

IMG_2645.jpg
 
OP
OP
MISTERgadget

MISTERgadget

Full Access Members
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Posts
227
Reaction score
201
Location
Miami
Now I've got an empty garage and some room to work on other bits and pieces. Let's get this looking 110% before it goes in.

IMG_2657.jpg

IMG_2658.jpg

Empty garage makes a great paint booth!

IMG_2726.jpg

IMG_2727.jpg

After the etching primer on aluminum, the front cover and the pulley bridge both got a few coats of Ford YN Silver Metallic (SEM Factory Pack cans) and then, 2K Glamour Clear

IMG_2734.jpg

IMG_2735.jpg

The metallic really pops and came out really nice on the pulley bridge in particular.

IMG_2733.jpg
 
OP
OP
MISTERgadget

MISTERgadget

Full Access Members
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Posts
227
Reaction score
201
Location
Miami
Busted out my two trusty friends to continue shooting paint!

IMG_2722.jpg

Nobody likes how crusty the top of the fenders looks when you pop the hood, so I masked off the area that Ford neglected to paint to finish them up how they should have been the first time!

IMG_2728.jpg

Quick scotchbrite scuff, a couple coats of color, a couple coats of clear, and they look good now!

IMG_2741.jpg

IMG_2736.jpg
 

JamaicaJoe

Full Access Members
Joined
Dec 20, 2020
Posts
640
Reaction score
249
Location
Oviedo FL
Is that a Harbor Freight engine stand? Just saw a picture of one that toppled on an uneven surface. You might want to secure it somehow.

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk
 

Tjhoward84

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2014
Posts
66
Reaction score
38
Location
Bothell, WA
Do you have the part number(s) for the door strikers? Are they the same for the front and rear doors?
 
OP
OP
MISTERgadget

MISTERgadget

Full Access Members
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Posts
227
Reaction score
201
Location
Miami
Is that a Harbor Freight engine stand? Just saw a picture of one that toppled on an uneven surface. You might want to secure it somehow.

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk

It is, thanks for checking on that! I've had probably a half dozen of them over the last decade or so. The 3 wheel one is super sketchy, the 4 wheel ones like I use are pretty good, like anything else with that much weight on a bunch of lowest bidder steel and sweatshop welds, always have to be thoughtful about how you move it around. So far never had an issue, but I don't push my luck either!

Do you have the part number(s) for the door strikers? Are they the same for the front and rear doors?

I don't have the PN handy, it's the same front and rear. If you look it up for a 2014 F150, that's the one.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
53,530
Posts
501,753
Members
47,053
Latest member
cfarnAK
Top