transmission swap im lost

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

TobyU

Full Access Members
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Posts
2,479
Reaction score
869
Location
Ohio
I had a similar problem, but mine wouldn't go into 3rd at all. I was driving along and it just dropped down to 2nd and wouldn't shift any more. It's an 05 with 105K on it now, 99K at the time (last August). I had towed a camper about 150 miles to the beach and been there a week -- the night before we were coming home the trans acted up! Stored camper and drove it home in 2nd gear, just didn't run over 3000 rpm (right at 50 mph) all the way home. Turned a 2 hour trip into 3, but got home safely. Turned out to be a snap ring inside the trans that let go, a common occurrence according to the shop I took it to. They installed a lot of upgraded parts, including a spiral stainless ring in place of the iron snap ring. Seems like it was about $3500 total for the rebuilt trans, dropped truck off and picked it up three days later. They didn't rebuild mine, but installed one they already had rebuilt... saves time, and it's a common enough trans to keep a couple on hand and rebuild when shop is slow. Gets customers out faster.
Sounds like the 2-3 accumulator.
It was a common recommendation anytime you had the pan off even for a fluid and filter change to replace it with the improve cat which was another accumulator and probably the better improve snap ring. Why didn't you just have yours fixed instead of rebuilding the whole thing? That sounds high for a rebuild too but depending on the area prices to vary in different parts of the country.
It's just hard to find an ethical or honest transmission shop. A lot of them don't even really know how to fix them inside anymore or there's only one guy there that does so all they want to do is swap them out with the units they have already purchased rebuilt. They often don't know from the symptoms what the problems actually are they just take them out and tear them apart and then find it. At that point there's so much money involved you're between a rock and a hard place.
A broken accumulator spring and a good handful of other problems can be fixed by just removing the pan or the valve body is the next step. Neither one requires the entire transmission to be removed from the vehicle or a complete rebuild. But the biggest problem is they don't want to do a minor repair that's just a minor repair for a couple hundred bucks. They want to get the big money and rebuild them every time.
 

creecer

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2019
Posts
18
Reaction score
3
Location
Woodstock, GA
Are you sure you had/have a 4R70w? AFAIK, they didn't use the r470w in 05. It was replaced by the 4r75 in early 2004. Electrical sensors are different. If you have a 3v 5.4L, you should have a 4r75w.
 

TobyU

Full Access Members
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Posts
2,479
Reaction score
869
Location
Ohio
Are you sure you had/have a 4R70w? AFAIK, they didn't use the r470w in 05. It was replaced by the 4r75 in early 2004. Electrical sensors are different. If you have a 3v 5.4L, you should have a 4r75w.
That is what I have read also but even 2003 had the 4 r75. The 2005 went with a 3 valve engine and then 2006 got the ZF 6-speed transmission.
 

creecer

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2019
Posts
18
Reaction score
3
Location
Woodstock, GA
That is what I have read also but even 2003 had the 4 r75. The 2005 went with a 3 valve engine and then 2006 got the ZF 6-speed transmission.

My 2003 has a 4r70w. The only ones that should have had the 75 would be the 5.43v motors, so late '03 production could have them. The 4.6 motor would have been the 4r70e.
 

TobyU

Full Access Members
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Posts
2,479
Reaction score
869
Location
Ohio
My 2003 has a 4r70w. The only ones that should have had the 75 would be the 5.43v motors, so late '03 production could have them. The 4.6 motor would have been the 4r70e.
I have an 03 Navigator and I'm almost certain it has the 75.
 

TobyU

Full Access Members
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Posts
2,479
Reaction score
869
Location
Ohio
Yup, the Navigator got the extra HP and the 4r75 or the ZF
I guess that makes sense since the Navigator has the 32 Val and more horsepower. I wish they would have put the 4r100 in it as it's a better transmission. And some of the first-gen Expeditions had them.
The Navigator didn't get the ZF until 06. I specifically would not buy an 05 because of the three valve even though it had the same trans as 03 and would not buy an 06 because it had the ZF 6-speed transmission.
 
OP
OP
T

tossen12

Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2020
Posts
11
Reaction score
0
Location
88130
Are you sure you had/have a 4R70w? AFAIK, they didn't use the r470w in 05. It was replaced by the 4r75 in early 2004. Electrical sensors are different. If you have a 3v 5.4L, you should have a 4r75w.
 
OP
OP
T

tossen12

Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2020
Posts
11
Reaction score
0
Location
88130
The tranny that failed and locked up on my daughter was a wreaking yard tranny . It had the used parts painted numbers on it . Pulled the tag off tranny R4w70
 
OP
OP
T

tossen12

Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2020
Posts
11
Reaction score
0
Location
88130
I got a chance to look at the gear position sensor today . Was out of adjustment . Readjusred sensor . Manual shift now drive is second gear , 2nd is low gear . I'm going to order a new sensor , thinking I screwed up the sensor by improper install on my part.
 
Top