I have a 2001 5.4l Expedition. It was garaged in the south and the body, suspension, frame, etc are in excellent condition. I use it as my daily driver and just hit 200k recently. The engine seems to run fine, although I've blown a couple plugs and it tends to smell like burnt oil from under the hood after it warms up. However, the transmission is shuddering bad while cruising. It has always shuddered just after it shifted gears, which I think is the torque converter, but now it has gotten worse.
I don't have a lot of trust in the vehicle for long trips, because of the mileage and transmission. Sometimes I tow a camper, and I need this thing to be reliable for long trips.
So, I'm considering investing in a re-manufactured engine and transmission, and I'll do the labor myself (I've replaced transmissions in a few jeeps, replaced clutches, that sorta thing). I figure for $5000 or so I can have a better-than-new engine and transmission and be good to go for another 100k-200k more miles (I realize the axles and transfer case also may need work / replaced soon too). This is based on the excellent condition of the paint, body, frame, suspension, interior, etc.
I'd like some opinions on this. It's my impression that a properly rebuilt engine can be better than stock (adding steel spark plug sleeves, etc, to beef up the weak parts of this engine). Am I wrong about that? I read some posts and it seems a lot of people say that a remanufactured engine is a big gamble.
Next question. If I'm going to the trouble to replace both the engine and transmission, is there any common sense upgrade to do? This has the stock 2001 5.4l Triton, and I've read good things about this transmission (apparently it's quite beefy for this size engine). Should I look at some larger / newer / better engine / transmission combos? I don't think I'd be interested in switching to diesel, because I'd imagine there's a ton of other stuff to go along with it (everything from the ECU to the fuel tank), although I could be wrong.
Next question. It seems to me if I'm going to the trouble to replace the transmission, I can save some effort by replacing the engine at the same time. Plus, again, I'm looking to get the reliability factor up. Am I wrong in thinking that replacing both at the same time saves me effort than doing each separately over time?
I'd appreciate any and all thoughts on this, especially from anyone who has done this before.
I don't have a lot of trust in the vehicle for long trips, because of the mileage and transmission. Sometimes I tow a camper, and I need this thing to be reliable for long trips.
So, I'm considering investing in a re-manufactured engine and transmission, and I'll do the labor myself (I've replaced transmissions in a few jeeps, replaced clutches, that sorta thing). I figure for $5000 or so I can have a better-than-new engine and transmission and be good to go for another 100k-200k more miles (I realize the axles and transfer case also may need work / replaced soon too). This is based on the excellent condition of the paint, body, frame, suspension, interior, etc.
I'd like some opinions on this. It's my impression that a properly rebuilt engine can be better than stock (adding steel spark plug sleeves, etc, to beef up the weak parts of this engine). Am I wrong about that? I read some posts and it seems a lot of people say that a remanufactured engine is a big gamble.
Next question. If I'm going to the trouble to replace both the engine and transmission, is there any common sense upgrade to do? This has the stock 2001 5.4l Triton, and I've read good things about this transmission (apparently it's quite beefy for this size engine). Should I look at some larger / newer / better engine / transmission combos? I don't think I'd be interested in switching to diesel, because I'd imagine there's a ton of other stuff to go along with it (everything from the ECU to the fuel tank), although I could be wrong.
Next question. It seems to me if I'm going to the trouble to replace the transmission, I can save some effort by replacing the engine at the same time. Plus, again, I'm looking to get the reliability factor up. Am I wrong in thinking that replacing both at the same time saves me effort than doing each separately over time?
I'd appreciate any and all thoughts on this, especially from anyone who has done this before.








