HAHA, You REALLY do not want to start talking Degrees, Certs and experience with me. You will lose.
I understand that this is a thread about Catch Can’s, and all you can do is come in it to bash the EB, without providing any valuable information. You tried to say that was why you would not own an EB equipped vehicle, yet every engine you mentioned until the 7.3 also has DI and issues with Carbon buildup made better by a Catch Can. Then you threw out a Motor designed for a completely different use case that will NEVER be in an Expedition. That in the Future will most likely also have DI, and could like mentioned above still benefit from a Catch Can.
It is very clear that I understand WAY more about how these things tick that you EVER will. Please keep responding. It just proves my point even further. I’ll be waiting.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
Ok Einstein. I’ll spell it out since you can’t comprede my point.
Catch cans are necessary in the first place on ecoboost engines due to DI which is a flawed design FORD adopted. ( nobody said that design is new).
To make matters worse, FORD installed these flawed engine designs on their F150 TRUCKS. ( we all know they installed on other model cars but this is a truck forum).
In addition to the DI issues the VVT design is also a problemo. Many of us who read know this.
Now here’s the kicker... my point... because of the above FORD f’d up further by using twin teeny turbos on a small displacement block in a TRUCK(which is different from a car).
The reason all this is f’d is many F150 owners tow their toys behind their trucks ( again, vs cars).
So you see Einstein, when you add all this together you end up w a f’d up TRUCK.
Ecoboost = teeny displacement + VVT + DI + teeny TT + TRUCKS and TOWING.
All this is NO BUENO. Comprende?
The catch can issue addresses the carbon build flaw but that’s all it does. It don’t fix stupid ... as in the design of the power plant overall.
