My logic is that it’s illogical to place a teeny weeny 6 cylinder and force air through it to compensate for its teeny weeny di...
Then add to that stupidity they direct inject gas into the combustion chambers and the valve train gets bathed in milky gunky goo. Ergo da catch can.
All this in a TRUCK. WTF?
Please note the new 7.3 gasser is not a VVT but a good ole pusher w single cam UNLIKE the teeny weeny v6 economy boost motor.
Just sayin
You entertain me immensely.
You bring up a Motor from the Super Duty line as an example. Something that will never be used in a 1/2 Ton SUV. The example you used before the HEMI, You were wrong about...can’t even stick to your original talking points.
If I was buying another 250(Which by the way I owned for 11 Years) I would consider a 7.3, but would most likely do the 6.7L Diesel...cause well Diesel and Turbo!
EVERY Modern engine with a PCV system has the gunk...so not really something you can blame on 2 less cylinders or the Turbo. The DI is an issue, but the Gen 2 EB’s solve that by adding PI also(best of both worlds). The DI is yet again not the 2 less cylinders or the Turbo’s fault.
It’s like you are defined by the number of cylinders in your vehicle.
I am VERY happy with my weeny V6 with 2 Turbos, in both my SUV’s. Nothing in their class can run with them under pretty much any circumstances! Both Towing and around the town. Plus easy to make even quicker.
If you don’t like the EB motors kindly move on out of a thread dedicated pretty much to the EB.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro