i think thats giving too much credit to ford here -
i can’t say whether the phaser repair even uses the sealant in question, or if it’s only the factory build - im sure someone else more informed may know the answer to this...
& i would imagine that the phaser quality / design is an issue here -
however i also wouldn’t be surprised if a portion /series of these engines had legit quality control issues during a certain build period where “factory sealant” excess would unintentionally block a poorly designed flow portal leading to repeating the same repairs without fixing the root problem. i mean, let’s be honest, they can’t even line up the doors & trim on a good percentage of these - what does that say about precision internals? doesn’t make me feel very confident. i know so many people that dumped their various 3.5 EB vehicles due to recurring phaser issues. combine that with a lesser quality phaser design & there’s your group of customers with serious beef.
it also may not be a class action YET because of Ford evading the actual underlying flow design issue / that seems to be more prevalent for a certain percentage of engines before QC caught on to the real problem which IMO is why some vehicles don’t follow the “official”bad parts build timeline ford offers us.
honestly we as customers are pretty much in the dark on the real main cause for this, which Ford no doubt keeps intentionally fuzzy
/ blames on parts, to help avoid any such class action or mass owner lawsuits. if i were them i would avoid at all costs any true pinpointing of the root problem is as to avoid such a situation - hence the constant deluge of “sure we can fix it, new parts design” warranty repairs in the millions, likely much cheaper than potential buybacks or reparations VW style.
i think for some of us it’s a perfect storm, & deadman leads the pack.