chuck s
Full Access Members
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2006
- Posts
- 1,823
- Reaction score
- 672
Positive Crankcase Ventilation burns contaminates in the engine. Vapors like oil, fuel, and water in the crankcase are sent back to be burned. The carburetor (remember those?) or port injection sprays fuel and this vapor onto the intake valves where the fuel (a powerful solvent) serves to keep the backs of the intake valves clean. Direct injection sprays it directly into the cylinder and the contaminates in the intake air can build up on the backs of the intake valves. A catch can filters out much of this contamination which reduces valve deposits.
Your 5.4 uses port injection making a catch can unnecessary. The EcoBoost engines started out with port injection and changed to direct injection for better engine management. The valve deposits started at this time causing "The sky is falling!" videos on the internet. The new Expedition 3.5 EB engines (2018?) use a combination of direct and port injection making a catch can unnecessary. The F150 got the dual injection engine a year or two before our Expeditions.
I'm not convinced these deposits will cause catastrophic engine damage but am hedging the bet with the LHT catch can. The crap that's in there every time can't be good.
My catch can was literally full of oil with a smattering of watery liquid on the bottom. When I dumped the can several months ago the liquid looked like chocolate milk, it was very watery.
I installed a dual catch can system on my little S2000 (port injection) engine out of curiosity and in two years have not needed to empty it. Only remains on the car because (1) I'm too lazy to deplumb it and (2) all the cool kids have them.
-- Chuck
Your 5.4 uses port injection making a catch can unnecessary. The EcoBoost engines started out with port injection and changed to direct injection for better engine management. The valve deposits started at this time causing "The sky is falling!" videos on the internet. The new Expedition 3.5 EB engines (2018?) use a combination of direct and port injection making a catch can unnecessary. The F150 got the dual injection engine a year or two before our Expeditions.
I'm not convinced these deposits will cause catastrophic engine damage but am hedging the bet with the LHT catch can. The crap that's in there every time can't be good.
My catch can was literally full of oil with a smattering of watery liquid on the bottom. When I dumped the can several months ago the liquid looked like chocolate milk, it was very watery.
I installed a dual catch can system on my little S2000 (port injection) engine out of curiosity and in two years have not needed to empty it. Only remains on the car because (1) I'm too lazy to deplumb it and (2) all the cool kids have them.
-- Chuck
Last edited: