I’ll have to read through this stuff later. Looks like an interesting discussion evolved? Just what I see on this page.
I’ll tell you guys, 800k is so far into 1%er territory it’s hard for most to understand how much money that is. Those are exactly the people that can pick up a 200k car and it’s not an issue. Two back of the envelope formulas you can use are House is 2.5 times your gross and car is half gross. So 200k car is not a sweat for 800k.
I’m with you on this one...I’m very surprised by some takes on here. So someone that has an $800k salary is bringing home, after taxes, about $40k per month.
@carymccarr is suggesting that person shouldn’t buy a $200k car.
Assuming that person is taking a regular old car loan at 3.11% (which is almost certainly not the case...they’re likely instead paying cash, leasing, etc), that’s a $3,600 payment, or 9% of their monthly income. That is high, but not absurd. Certainly not if they have a low house payment, no house payment, etc.
If you limit yourself to buying a car valued at 5% of your taxable income, you’d have to be making $1.6mil in taxable income a year to be able to “afford” a platinum Expi. I don’t know too many folks making that kind of money a year (and I work with several) driving a Ford.
Of course all your other expenses come into play, but that just seems wildly conservative. To each their own, of course and certainly someone using the 5% guide as
@carymccarr suggests should be commended for their restraint.
Again, I’m not arguing here, I’m just fascinated at the take. And it is certainly not the approach taken by most given the average salary in the US is $56k and the average car sales price is $36k. (Granted, someone making $56k should absolutely NOT be buying a $36k car, but the numbers are informative.)